Skip to content

Scarborough, ON · Private foundation

The Esty Frankel Family Charitable Foundation

The relief of poverty the advancement of education the advancement of religion and the advancement of other cahritable purposes which benefit the community as a whole.

C$229k
Granted FY2018
28
Grants FY2018
—
Regions reached
C$144k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under C$10k24 grants · C$44k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$41k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$144k
C$1,800
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATC$143,914
UNITED JEWISH APPEALC$18,000
EITZ CHAIM SCHOOLSC$13,084
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$10,000
TORONTO TEACHERS TORAH UMESORAHC$5,000
FRDS OF JCTC$5,000
THE SMALL WONDERSC$3,600
RFRO-RUCHAMA FRAIDEL RELIEF ORGC$3,600
CHESED OF CLANTON PARKC$3,600
KAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTREC$3,000
SHARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL FDTNC$2,500
YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAHC$2,000
CLANTON PARK SYNAGOGUEC$1,875
KESHER YEHUDIC$1,800
LIFE'S DOORC$1,800
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$447k · 14 repeat orgsC$43k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

C$447k
C$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+6%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    Eitz Chaim Schools
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$81k · revenue +23%
  • UJ
    United Jewish Appeal
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$36k · revenue +98%
  • MS
    Mount Sinai Hospital Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$30k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • CF
    Canadian Friends of Shalva
    one grant, 2017 · C$12k · revenue -52%
  • PA
    Project Aim Programsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +585%
  • RF
    RFRO-Ruchama Fraidel Relief Orggraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +428%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
3
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
4
The Canadian Jewish Educational Fund

The charity provides scholarships and promotes the study of judaism carrying out educational programming both in and out of schools, intensive study workshops and teacher training in biblical studies.

—
5
Torah Schools for Israel

To provide scholarships to deserving students to enable them to study the bible and other jewish courses to subsidize bus transportation for needy students to pay for tutors to provide supplemental hours of education and ensure the…

—
6
The Foundations of Torah Charitable Organization

To establish maintain and support a house of worship with services conducted in accordance with the jewish faith and to provide financial assictance in the form of bursaries and scholarships to students to assist in the costs of…

—
7
The Canadian Friends of Mercaz Hatorah

Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.

—
8
Canadian Friends of the Institute 0HOLEI Torah

The charity provides scholarship to needy students

—
9
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
10
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
11
Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto

The jewish foundation of greater toronto receives manages and invests funds as well as disburses grants to qualified donees. using a research-driven approach the jewish foundation of greater toronto strategically distributes to community…

—
12
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZAT — C$261,741 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEitz Chaim Schools — C$80,634 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Jewish Appeal — C$36,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMount Sinai Hospital Foundation — C$30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Friends of Shalva — C$12,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetZareinu Educational Centre — C$10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCHESED OF CLANTON PARK — C$5,400 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTHE SMALL WONDERS — C$5,400 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTORONTO TEACHERS TORAH UMESORAH — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFRDS OF JCT — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetClanton Park Synagogue — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLife's Door — C$3,710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRFRO-RUCHAMA FRAIDEL RELIEF ORG — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH — C$3,180 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIZRACHI CANADA — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHachnosas Kallah of Toronto — C$2,860 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSHARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL FDTN — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetProject Aim Programs — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNETIVOT HATROAH DAY SCHOOL — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRFRO-Ruchama Fraidel Relief Org — C$1,800 over 1y, 12% of budgetEMUNAH WOMEN OF TORONTO — C$1,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTORONTO MIKVAH SOCIETY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJACS Toronto — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSasson Vsimcha" — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHATZOLOH TORONTO — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBeth Avraham Yoseph of Toronto — C$900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCSY — C$800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECHO-EZRAS CHOLIM ORGANIZATION — C$720 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYU Torah Mitzion Beit Midrash — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BENJAMIN FOUNDATION — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEcho Age Inc. — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Cancer Society — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE — C$72 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fieldgate Cares FoundationON16.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The Robert and Renee Rubinstein Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Krauss Family Charitable Trust · Messorah Tzedakah Foundation · Silver Family Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · The Weitz Family Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 785432295:2018-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Esty Frankel Family’s filings →