Eriksdale, MB · Charitable organization
The Elizabeth M Crowe Memorial Hospital Guild
Donation to lakeshore handi van purchase of equipment to ierha: x-ray imaging chair 3 ergonomic chairs for nursing station portable doppler machine 2 tympatic thermometers telehealthe equipment.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STARS AIR AMBULANCE | C$500 |
| ERIKSDALE UNITED CHURCH | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$500 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EUERIKSDALE UNITED CHURCH5× · 2020–2024 · C$900 · revenue +51%
- CMCANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH MB DIVISION5× · 2018–2023 · C$600 · revenue +47%
- TATHE ARTHRITIS SOCIETY MB DIVISION5× · 2019–2023 · C$600 · revenue +6%
Funded once
- IEINTERLAKE EASTERN HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$83k · revenue +232% · 29% of their budget
- EMEriksdale Memorial Community Centreone grant, 2018 · C$500
- SASTARS AIR AMBULANCEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$100 · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.