Skip to content

Woodbridge, ON · Charitable organization

The Earth Rangers Foundation

1)The show program educates students about timely environmental topics and conservation projects and encourages the adoption of sustainable behaviours.

C$137k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$112k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$16k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$112k
C$9,476
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Earth Rangers USA FoundationC$111,538
Individual grant recipientC$10,000
The Nature Conservancy of CanadaC$9,476
Wildlife Conservation Society of CanadaC$3,163
International Conservation Fund of CanadaC$3,020
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 39% of grant dollars (C$482k). The 61% that went abroad (C$765k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 61% of all-years giving (C$765k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$732k · 2 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.1M · 9 repeat orgsC$151k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

C$1.1M
C$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+25%

Still filing today

89%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    The Nature Conservancy of Canada
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$185k · revenue +144%
  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society of Canada
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$47k · revenue +49%
  • CP
    Canadian Parks and Wilderness
    3× · 2017–2022 · C$43k · revenue +252%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Manitoba
    one grant, 2019 · C$30k · revenue +9%
  • BS
    Bird Studies Canadagraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$30k · revenue +69%
  • TU
    Trent Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$15k · revenue +62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nature Canada / Canada Nature

Nature Canada's mission is to protect and conserve wildlife habitats in Canada by engaging people and advocating on behalf of nature. The organization conducts conservation work which involves supporting community-based efforts to protect…

—
2
Wildlife Preservation Trust Canada/

Wildlife preservation canada exists to save animal species at risk from extinction in canada by performing hands-on action for species requiring direct intervention to recover. wpc build canada's conservation capacity by providing…

—
3
World Wildlife Fund Canada Fonds Mondial Pour La Nature Can Ada

World Wildlife Fund Canada is a national registered charity formed to collect manage and disburse funds through suitable bodies or individuals for the conservation of fauna flora forests landscape water soils and other natural resources in…

—
4
Bird Ecology and Conservation Ontario

1. Research to advance the conservation of songbird species at risk in agricultural landscapes; and 2. Research to improve our understanding of the distribution abundance and productivity of songbird species at risk.

—
5
Biological Survey of Canada

1) To identify and address gaps in knowledge of Canada's biological diversity. 2) To promote the importance of fundamental taxonomic research on Canada's species. 3) To promote awareness of the values and vulnerabilities of Canada's…

—
6
Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society - British Columbia

The Marine Conservation Program which plays a leading role in advancing the establishment of a network of marine protected areas (MPAs) across British Columbia. The Northern Terrestrial Conservation Program works collaboratively with…

—
7
Freshwater Conservation Canada

Freshwater conservation canada is committed to conserving protecting and restoring canada's freshwater ecosystems and their coldwater resources for current and future generations. programs and projects are delivered by our professional…

—
8
Canadian Wildlife Federation/FÉDÉRation Canadienne De La Faune

Cwf’s mission is to conserve and inspire the conservation of canada’s wildlife and habitat for the use and enjoyment of all through research direct programming education and advocacy. cwf is recognized for our leadership in bringing…

—
9
Oceans Research and Conservation Association - Orca

Research and studies related to the conservation of marine life; identifying endangered marine species determining what their habitat needs are and how best to protect them and building the evidence base to support conservation efforts.

—
10
Corvus Centre for Conservation Policy

LAND USE AND BIODIVERSITY Land use is a general term and it refers to how we build on use protect travel across reside on and play on the physical land base and the waters that support it. Land use decision-making is the primary vector for…

—
11
Natureserve Canada

The preservation of the natural environment by undertaking supporting and supervising research made available to the public.

—
12
Canadian Council on Invasive Species

The council works collaboratively across jurisdictional boundaries to support actions and information that can help reduce the threat and impacts of invasive species.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society/La Société pour la nature et les parcs du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Trent University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Nature Conservancy of Canada — C$184,551 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society of Canada — C$46,597 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCanadian Parks and Wilderness — C$42,657 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTNC Canada — C$35,038 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of Manitoba — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBird Studies Canada — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Conservation Fund of Canada — C$22,337 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTrent University — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Calgary — C$13,914 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNature Saskatchewan — C$12,860 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetOcen Wise Conservation Association — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYork University — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Alberta — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Toronto and Region Conservation Authority — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Toronto Zoo — C$5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWildlands League — C$3,333 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Td Friends of the Environment FoundationON9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Td Friends of the Environment Foundation · The Schad Foundation · The McLean Foundation · Makeway Foundation · Private Giving Foundation · The George Cedric Metcalf Charitable Foundation · R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · Aqueduct Foundation · Toronto Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Vancouver Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 892200528:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Earth Rangers’ filings →