Toronto, ON · Private foundation
The E & S Charitable Foundation
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$835k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY | C$835,274 |
| KENSINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION | C$50,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$50k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY4× · 2020–2024 · C$980k · revenue +11%
- WCWOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL6× · 2017–2022 · C$244k · revenue +132%
- CFCAMH FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2022 · C$100k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Victoriagraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$15k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.