Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Daymark Foundation Inc.

To promote health and address mental illness by providing services and other supports including: (a) evaluating mental health programs and modifying adjusting forecasting and improving the design management integration and outcome of such programs; (b) conducting research of causes risk factors treatments and other issues related…

C$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
Regions reached
C$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$17k
  • C$10k–50k7 grants · C$168k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$390k
  • C$250k+2 grants · C$775k
C$25,985
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Maple Leaf Centre for ActionC$500,000
National Collaboration for Doula AccessC$275,000
Ottawa Birth and Wellness CentreC$200,000
McMaster UniversityC$100,000
ReliefC$90,000
Behavioral Insights (Canada) LtdC$41,576
Centre de Recherche de l Hôpital DouglasC$35,000
Mommy Monitor (Mino Care)C$25,985
Birthmark TorontoC$25,000
Monash UniversityC$16,000
Can. Perinatal Mental Hlth CollaborativeC$12,186
Forward Global Philanthropy SocietyC$12,000
Individual grant recipientC$5,147
University of ConnecticutC$5,000
SmartMom (University of British Columbia)C$5,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 52% of grant dollars (C$2.5M). The 48% that went abroad (C$2.3M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 48% of all-years giving (C$2.3M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$115k · 3 grants
AustriaC$10k · 1 grant

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.8M · 9 repeat orgsC$2.0M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
20

Total granted

C$2.8M
C$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+16%

Still filing today

56%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$512k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    Maple Leaf Foods Centre for Action on Food Security
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$1.5M · revenue +106%
  • C(
    CREST.BD (PolarUS) University of British Columbia
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$280k · revenue +8%
  • R
    Relief
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$180k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of British Columbia
    one grant, 2022 · C$255k
  • OB
    Ottawa Birth & Wellness Centre and Ottawa Hospital
    one grant, 2023 · C$192k
  • TS
    The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada
    one grant, 2022 · C$181k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Canadian Foundation for Women's Health

To distribute funding to organizations and universities for research in the field of women's sexual reproductive health.

—
2
Alberta Foundation for Health Research

Alberta foundation for health research supports health research projects that are provinvial in scope which impact and originate but are beyond the scope of alberta innovates - health solutions

—
3
Mental Health Research Canada/Recherche En Sante Mentale Canada

Mental Health Research Canada (MHRC) is a national charitable organization that is dedicated to improving the lives of all Canadians by advancing mental health knowledge. Our vision is to create a Canada with better mental health for all…

—
4
The Stratas Foundation

Distributed (2) scholarships and/or private research grants to Canadian students and/or scholars at accredited universities or research centers in Canada. Each award was allocated toward a mental health research program intended to advance…

—
5
Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation

Funding for grants is provided to the Stollery Children's Hospital the University of Alberta the Women and Children's Health Research Institute the Mental Health Foundation and Alberta Health Services for research and education equipment…

—
6
Pacific Public Health Foundation

The pacific public health foundation works in collaboration with the bc centre for disease control (bccdc) and more broadly the health sector to support public health in bc by funding and facilitating evidence-based work that has an…

—
7
Mental Health Partnerships of Canada

Understanding and research of mental health and study of treatments

—
8
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
9
The Women's Health Research Foundation of Canada Inc.

The foundation awarded four scholarships to full-time graduate students doing women's health research projects at the university of manitoba. the foundation also awarded four prizes at the manitoba schools science symposium and one prize…

—
10
Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

Annual peer-reviewed funding award/grant competitions projects and activities that foster talen development in bc; support provincial health system priorities health system transformation and innovation; build capacity for research uptake;…

—
11
Grand Challenges Canada Foundation
—
12
Leap Pecaut Centre for Social Impact

LEAP Pecaut Centre for Social Impact initiates and leads multi-sector collaborations to tackle some of society’s biggest problems in education employment and health. Over five years taking their needs and stages of development into…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's College Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Birth Mark. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMaple Leaf Foods Centre for Action on Food Security — C$1,500,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetCREST.BD (PolarUS) University of British Columbia — C$280,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRelief — C$180,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetMcMaster University — C$100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA St. John's — C$40,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetFamilies Canada — C$40,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCentre de Recherche de l Hôpital Douglas — C$35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBirthmark Toronto — C$30,200 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCAMH (YWHO) — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForward Global Philanthropy Society — C$12,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWomen's College Hospital Foundation — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Maple Leaf Foods Centre for Action on Food Security ↗
  • Who funds CREST.BD (PolarUS) University of British Columbia ↗
  • Who funds Relief ↗
  • Who funds McMaster University ↗
  • Who funds YWCA St. John's ↗
  • Who funds Families Canada ↗
  • Who funds Centre de Recherche de l Hôpital Douglas ↗
  • Who funds Birthmark Toronto ↗
  • Who funds CAMH (YWHO) ↗
  • Who funds Forward Global Philanthropy Society ↗
  • Who funds Women's College Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YWCA ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater TorontoON4.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Toronto · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 787418946:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Daymark’s filings →