Halifax, NS · Public foundation
The Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation
Dalhousie medical research foundation provides funding for research in the faculties of medicine health and dentistry at dalhousie university in the form of studentships graduate studentships fellowships chairs and other salary support the purchase of equipment and renovation of research facilities and other research grants.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY | C$3,247,847 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DUDalhousie University7× · 2017–2023 · C$32M · revenue +41%
- IHIWK Health Centre4× · 2019–2022 · C$406k · revenue +108%
- NSNova Scotia Health Authority2× · 2021–2022 · C$304k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- NSNOVA SCOTIA HEALTH AUTHORITYone grant, 2020 · C$145k
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO RESEARCH INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$16k · revenue +66%
- MHMENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NOVA SCOTIAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +203%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dalhousie University ↗
- Who funds IWK Health Centre ↗
- Who funds Nova Scotia Health Authority ↗
- Who funds University Internal Medicine Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN MEDICAL HALL OF FAME ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NOVA SCOTIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.