Toronto, ON · Private foundation
The Corpus Christi Foundation
The objects of the organization are to preach and advance the teachings of the traditional anglican faith and the beliefs and observances associated with that faith by maintaining a fund to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom to other registered charities in canada.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$2k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$46k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST. THOMAS' ANGLICAN CHURCH | C$27,361 |
| ST. GEORGE'S ROUND CHURCH | C$18,643 |
| TRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCH | C$2,199 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- STST. THOMAS ANGLICAN CHURCH5× · 2019–2024 · C$157k · revenue ×45 · 100% of their budget
- TSTHE SYNOD OF THE DIOCESE OF SASKATCHEWAN2× · 2020–2021 · C$39k · revenue +26%
- SGST. GEORGE'S ROUND CHURCH2× · 2020–2024 · C$22k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- WCWYCLIFFE COLLEGEone grant, 2021 · C$23k · revenue +10%
- HUHURON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$3k · revenue +72%
- TATRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCHgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$3k · revenue +43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Trinity college provides educational instruction ot undergraduate students in the faculty of arts & science at the university of toronto and to basic and advanced degree students in the faculty of divinity trinity college. all of the…
Anglican church
Theological college engaged in graduate level theological education.
St. andrew’s college is a united church theological college on the university of saskatchewan campus. the college offers degrees towards ordained and lay ministry. the degrees offered are dmin bth mdiv mts and a joint bth/mdiv. the college…
College: - Education of theology students and church leaders - Residence for university students - Bursaries and scholarships for students Chaplaincy: - Pastoral support of students
To receive and maintain a fund or funds to to apply from time to time all or part of the capital and the income therefrom for the purpose of trinity college school and in furtherance thereof to solicit promote and encourage donations…
Tyndale University is dedicated to the pursuit of truth to excellence in teaching learning and research for the enriching of mind heart and character to serve the church and the world for the glory of God. Ongoing programs: 1) To provide a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Corpus Christi Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wycliffe College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST. THOMAS ANGLICAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds THE SYNOD OF THE DIOCESE OF SASKATCHEWAN ↗
- Who funds WYCLIFFE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ST. GEORGE'S ROUND CHURCH ↗
- Who funds HURON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds TRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KING'S COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Anglican Foundation of Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.