Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Private foundation

The Concord Projects Foundation Inc.

The oranization provides support for charitable causes by making donations to those qualified donees ( as recognized by the canada revenue agency) who are engaged in charitable undertakings

C$199k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
Regions reached
C$33k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k20 grants · C$6k
  • C$10k–50k7 grants · C$193k
C$150
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITALC$33,483
CAMP ARNESC$33,333
MENNONITE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTEC$33,333
LCC INTERNATIONAL FUND INCC$33,333
MAIN STREET PROJECTC$25,000
CANDACE HOUSEC$25,000
MANITOBA CAMPING ASSOCIATION SUNSHINE FUNDC$10,000
RED RIVER COLLEGEC$2,000
CANCERCARE MANITOBA FOUNDATIONC$450
WINNIPEG HUMANE SOCIETYC$300
HELPING HANDSC$300
WINNIPEG PET RESCUEC$300
HEART & STROKEC$150
JUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATIONC$150
ROSSBROOK HOUSE FOUNDATIONC$150
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.0M · 17 repeat orgsC$59k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

C$1.0M
C$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+55%

Still filing today

94%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    TRUE NORTH YOUTH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$120k · revenue +111%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$100k · revenue +20%
  • RC
    RIVERWOOD CHURCH COMMUNITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · C$100k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • TN
    TRUE NORTH YOUTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$50k · revenue +121%
  • RA
    RISE ABOVE
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +9%
  • RR
    RED RIVER COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Manitoba Inc.

Rmhc manitoba supports the health and well-being of children by providing a 'home-away-from-home' and other essential servicces for critically ill chronically ill and seriously injured children and their families

—
2
CancerCare Manitoba

Cancercare manitoba maintains and co-ordinates a province-wide program for cancer prevention diagnosis treatment education and research.

—
3
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority

1) medical surgical and psychiatric healthcare. 2) medical research

—
4
The University of Winnipeg

Providing education

—
5
Manitoba Realtors Shelter Foundation Inc.

Providing support for Manitoba based shelter related charities by making donations to qualified donees who are: (a) engaged in the research of shelter related topics and the development and supply of homes and transitional shelter; (b)…

—
6
Westland Foundation Inc.

Westland foundation education fund provides post graduate scholarship funds to students in inner winnipeg. westland foundation inc has entered into agreements with red river college university of winnipeg university of manitoba and the…

—
7
Manitoba Adolescent Treatment Centre Inc.

Manitoba adolescent treatment centre provides inpatient and out patient accomodation as well as rehabilitative and medical care and treatment programs to children and adolescents in

—
8
The University of Winnipeg Foundation Inc.

The foundation receives donations from annual giving programs and other campaigns. Funds are gifted to the University of Winnipeg for education purposes (scholarships/bursaries) and for capital and capademic enhancement purposes.

—
9
Diabetes Foundation of Manitoba Inc.

research

—
10
Manitoba Habitat Heritage Corporation

Manitoba habitat conservancy (mhc) is manitoba's leading habitat and wildlife-focused charity directly implementing voluntary long-term conservation through perpetual conservation agreements and habitat improvement through restoration and…

—
11
Manitoba Possible Foundation Inc.

To generate investment earnings and foster philanthropy to help eliminate barriers for manitoba with disabilities

—
12
End Homelessness Winnipeg Inc.

To bring together all sectors of our community to work with people who are experiencing homelessness so that together we can prevent homelessness support recovery and wellbeing find suitable housing and measure our success in ways that…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harvest Manitoba Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Richer Daycare Centre Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
16/34
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUE NORTH YOUTH FOUNDATION — C$119,500 over 7y, 12% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — C$100,149 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA — C$100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERWOOD CHURCH COMMUNITY — C$100,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCAMP ARNES — C$99,999 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetMAIN STREET PROJECT — C$75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMULLY CHILDREN'S FAMILY CANADA — C$75,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetLCC INTERNATIONAL FUND INC. — C$66,666 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMENNONITE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE — C$66,666 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMENNONITE CENTRA COMMITTEE — C$66,666 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWESTMINSTER HOUSING SOCIETY — C$50,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTRUE NORTH YOUTH FOUNDATION — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetINNER CITY YOUTH ALIVE — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCANDACE HOUSE — C$50,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetRED RIVER COLLEGE — C$8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASSIE AND FRIENDS — C$1,650 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEPILEPSY AND SEIZURE ASSOCIATION OF MANITOBA — C$1,650 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCANCER CARE MANITOBA — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINNIPEG PET RESCUE — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS — C$300 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetWINNIPEG HUMANE SOCIETY — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMS CANADA — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATION — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN NEONATAL FOUNDATION — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN COVENANT HEIGHTS CHRISTIAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE OF ST MALO INC — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCUEIL KATERI CENTRE — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANITOBA LUNG ASSOCIATION — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST MANITOBA — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSILOAM MISSION — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART & STROKE — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOCTORS W/OUT BORDERS — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHER DAYCARE CENTER — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg FoundationMB13.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · All Charities Campaign · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · Lawton Partners Charitable Giving Foundation Inc. · Abundance Canada · Starbuck All Charities Inc. · De Fehr Foundation Inc. · Price Family Foundation Inc. · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · The Buller Foundation Inc. · The Bill and Margaret Fast Family Foundation Inc.

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 718641897:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Concord Projects’ filings →