Penticton, BC · Charitable organization
The Christopher Society of Penticton
Assistance to various community non-profit organizations
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADIAN FOOD FOR CHILDREN OKANAGAN DIVISION | C$10,000 |
| ST.VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY | C$10,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +115% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SDST.VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY5× · 2017–2023 · C$31k · revenue +12% · 39% of their budget
- CFCANADIAN FOOD FOR CHILDREN OKANAGAN DIVISION5× · 2017–2023 · C$17k · revenue +115% · 32% of their budget
- PRPENTICTON RECOVERY RESOURCE SOCIETY (DISCOVERY HOUSE)4× · 2017–2020 · C$6k · revenue +363%
Funded once
- SOSOUTH OKANAGAN SIMILKAMEEN MEDICAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · C$200k · revenue +24%
- SOSOUTH OKANAGAN SIMILKAMEEN MEDICAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · C$50k · revenue -27%
- KOKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL 3127one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Child care resource and referral program family resource program nourish families playful healing drop in childcare
Providing food to local families in need.
The society operates a halfway house under contract with correctional service canada in kelowna b.c.
Emergency Housing and services Second stage housing Outreach support PEACE Program Thrift Store Voucher Program Education and Prevention
The charity operates ozanam recovery home which is a 19 bed transition home for adult men located in kelowna bc who are struggling with addictions mental health issues or both. this includes recovery programs clinical counselling life…
Assisting families with medical expenses and travel subsidies for children Donating to regions for specific programs benfiting children Community projects that benefit children and adolescents
Provision of emergency shelter provision of supportive housing foradults; provision of case planning homeless outreach advocacy wellness and health programming referrals and support services including connections to supportive employment…
The SOSMWS operating as the South Okanagan Mental Wellness Centre provides support and resources for those struggling with mental illness and to those whose loved ones struggle with mental illness. Our support and resources fall within two…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Food for Children Okanagan Division and the most unlike its peers is The Hospital for Sick Children Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTH OKANAGAN SIMILKAMEEN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH OKANAGAN SIMILKAMEEN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST. ANN'S PARISH CHURCH ↗
- Who funds ST.VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FOOD FOR CHILDREN OKANAGAN DIVISION ↗
- Who funds PENTICTON RECOVERY RESOURCE SOCIETY (DISCOVERY HOUSE) ↗
- Who funds SOUTH OKANAGAN WOMEN IN NEED SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PENTICTON COMMUNITY SOUPATERIA SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL 3127 ↗
- Who funds HOSPITAL FOR SICK KIDS TORONTO ↗
- Who funds PENTICTON COMMUNITY SOUPATERIA SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PENTICTON BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds PENTICTON MENTAL HEALTH SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the South Okanagan Similkameen · First West Foundation · United Way British Columbia · United Way Southern Interior Bc · Community Foundations of Canada · Raymond James Canada Foundation · Bc Government Employees Community Services Fund Trust · United Way of Calgary and Area · Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Vancouver Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.