Skip to content
Canadian charities

Westmount, QC · Private foundation

The Charles Evelyne and Sandra Dolansky Foundation

The charity has continued its efforts on its main objectives mental health and education.

C$868k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$371k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$12k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$30k
  • C$50k–250k4 grants · C$455k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$371k
C$60,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITYC$371,000
COMBINED JEWISH APPEALC$185,000
CHABAD LIFELINEC$150,000
MELANOMA CANADAC$60,000
ALZHEIMERS GROUPE INCC$60,000
CHABAD OF WEST MOUNTC$20,000
FONATION LE RENFORTC$10,000
SEGAL CENTERC$5,000
JEWISH PEOPLES @ PERETZ SCHOOLSC$5,000
ZORA CAFÉC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.1M · 5 repeat orgsC$542k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

C$1.1M
C$320k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$222k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CJ
    COMBINED JEWISH APPEAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$335k · revenue +54%
  • MC
    MELANOMA CANADA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$120k · revenue +52%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF WEST MOUNT
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$35k · revenue +179%

Funded once

  • DH
    DOUGLAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$200k · revenue +44%
  • LR
    LIFELINE RECOVERY AND PREVENTION
    one grant, 2023 · C$100k · revenue +15%
  • CC
    CUSSS CENTRE OUEST
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
2
Autisme Montréal
—
3
Agence Ometz

The purpose of the organization is to provide employment immigration and social services to help people meet their challenges and fulfill their potential and to secure the growth and vitality of the montreal jewish community.

—
4
Fondation de la déficience intellectuelle et des troubles duspectre de l'autisme de Montréal (Fondation Di-Tsa de Montréal)

Sa mission est d'assister des personnes ayant une déficience intellectuelle ou présentant des troubles du spectre de l'autisme

—
5
Chsld Juif de Montréal

Provide the highest quality continuum of health care and social services throughout out network of institution provide compassionate care and services that are centered on the user and create an exceptional user experience develop and…

—
6
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—
7
La Corporation du Centre Hospitalier Gériatrique Maimonides/Maimonides Hospital Geriatric Center

Provide the highest quality continuum of health care and social services throughout out network of institution provide compassionate care and services that are centered on the user and create an exceptional user experience develop and…

—
8
Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal
—
9
Institut de Montréal pour la Douance et la Diversité et Montréal Institute for Giftedness and Diversity
—
10
Ciusss du centre-sud-de-l'ile-de-montreal

Le centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (ciusss) du centre-sud-de-l île-de- montréal a comme mission de veiller à la santé et au bien-être de la population de son territoire. dans le cadre des mandata locaux…

—
11
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociauxde la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec
—
12
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociauxde l'Est-de-L'Île-de-Montréal

Fournir des soins de santé aux bénéficiaires hospitalisés hébergés et/ou en sonsultation externe

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services SociauxDu Centre-Ouest-de-L'Île-de-Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Segal Centre for Performing Arts / Centre Segal des Arts de la Scène. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY — C$621,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetCOMBINED JEWISH APPEAL — C$335,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDOUGLAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$200,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetMELANOMA CANADA — C$120,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetLIFELINE RECOVERY AND PREVENTION — C$100,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetCHABAD OF WEST MOUNT — C$35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFOUNDATION LE REFORT GRANDE LIGNE — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCUSSS CENTRE OUEST — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS AGI — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSEGAL CENTER — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH PEOPLES @ PERETZ SCHOOLS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZORA CAFÉ — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Alvin Segal Family Fo…Jewish Foundation of …Nellie Philanthropy F…Federation CjaFondation Familiale G…Conam Charitable Foun…Morris and Rosalind G…Gurman Foundation/Fon…Fondation Eldee-Eldee…Maxwell Cummings Fami…ORT Canada
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC11.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Alvin Segal Family Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Nellie Philanthropy Foundation · Federation Cja · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · Gurman Foundation/Fondation Gurman · Fondation Eldee-Eldee Foundation · Maxwell Cummings Family Foundation - Fondation de la Famille Maxwell Cummings · ORT Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-04-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 761295930:2024-04-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Charles Evelyne and Sandra Dolansky’s filings →