Skip to content

Dieppe, NB · Private foundation

The Blue River Foundation Trust

Private foundation set-up for charitable giving.

C$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
Regions reached
C$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k14 grants · C$40k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$60k
C$2,500
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LILLIAN ALLBON ANIMAL SHELTERC$25,000
PEOPLE FOR ANIMAL WELLBEINGC$25,000
NOVA SCOTIA SPCAC$10,000
TANTRAMAR REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL (FOOD & NUTRITION SUPPORTC$5,000
SACKVILLE FOOD BANKC$5,000
PICK OF THE LITTER SOCIETYC$2,500
WABANAKI SCHOOL (FOOD & NUTRITION SUPPORT PROGRAM)C$2,500
ARNOLD H. MCLEOD SCHOOL (FOOD & NUTRITION SUPPORT PROGRC$2,500
FOREST GLEN SCHOOL (FOOD AND NUTRITION SUPPORT PROGRAM)C$2,500
BIRCHMOUNT SCHOOL (FOOD & NUTRITION SUPPORT PROGRAMS)C$2,500
SPCA ST. JOHN'SC$2,500
CHARLOTTE COUNTRY SPCAC$2,500
FREDERICTON SPCAC$2,500
FOOD DEPOT ALIMENTAIRE INC.C$2,500
MISFIT MANOR DOG RESCUE SOCIETYC$2,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$90k · 8 repeat orgsC$85k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

C$90k
C$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+6%

Still filing today

88%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$58k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR ANIMAL WELLBEING
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$50k · revenue +7%
  • HC
    HARLOTTE COUNTRY SPCA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$5k · revenue +54%
  • FS
    FREDRICTON SPCA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$5k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SF
    SACKVILLE FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · C$8k · revenue +6%
  • NS
    NOVA SCOTIA SPCA
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k
  • TR
    TANTRAMAR REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL (FOOD & NUTRITION SUPPORT PRO
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Brunswick Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals/Société protectrice des animaux (Noveau-Brunswick)

Develop and supervise a highly skilled team of animal protection services - who investigate animal abuse and neglect complaints across nb including laying charges under the spca act and the criminal code of canada. respond to animal…

—
2
Victoria County Animal Shelter Inc.

Care shelter and adoption of abandoned and surrendered family pets. Community programs: Trap Neuter Release(TNR); Prevent Another Litter (PAL); Spay Neuter Assistance Program (SNAP) Fostering

—
3
Society for Animal in Distress (North Shore)

For the care and treatment of abandoned animals finding homes for abandoned animals adhere to no-kill policy

—
4
Niagara Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and Humane Society

Niagara spca operates an animal shelter clinic and provides animal control services in the niagara region.

—
5
Lower Mainland Humane Society

Rescuing stray abandoned abused or surrendered animals; operating an animal adoption program

—
6
Victoria Humane Society

The Victoria Humane Society is involved with animal welfare at many levels in the Victoria region and across the province. From heroic acts of rescue to conducting spay and neuter clinics in remote communities to ongoing fundraising events…

—
7
Carleton County Animal Shelter Inc

Provide food shelter and medical care to abandoned animals primarily dogs + cats until they are adopted into a good home. we are a no-kill shelter.

—
8
Victoria Pet Adoption Society

The purpose of the society is to rehome unwanted pets to good approved homes. we provide medical care to all adoptees ensuring they are fixed micrcochipped and vaccinated. 100% volunteer run

—
9
Animal Rescue Coalitions Nova Scotia

Rescuing stray unwanted and abandoned & personal surrendered companion animals from the general public animal control & local vets.

—
10
Humane Society Yukon

Animal shelter housing cats and dogs from throughout the yukon territory until adopted.

—
11
North East Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc.

The society fundraises and receives donations to run a shelter for abandoned animals. this shelter services the north east region of saskatchewan and focus on animal rescue and animal adoption.

—
12
Cape Breton Feline Support Society

Spade and neuter stray cats and find homes for them

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Nova Scotia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
4/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPEOPLE FOR ANIMAL WELLBEING — C$50,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLILLIAN ALLBON ANIMAL SHELTER — C$25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNOVA SCOTIA SPCA — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSACKVILLE FOOD BANK — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED NOVA SCOTIA — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD DEPOT ALIMENTAIRE INC — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEI HUMAINE SOCIETY — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHARLOTTE COUNTRY SPCA — C$5,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMISFIT MANOR DOG RESCUE SOCIETY — C$5,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSACKVILLE FOOD BANK — C$5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFREDRICTON SPCA — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPCA ST. JOHN'S — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPICK OF THE LITTER SOCIETY — C$2,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR ANIMAL WELLBEING ↗
  • Who funds LILLIAN ALLBON ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds NOVA SCOTIA SPCA ↗
  • Who funds SACKVILLE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FEED NOVA SCOTIA ↗
  • Who funds FOOD DEPOT ALIMENTAIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEI HUMAINE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HARLOTTE COUNTRY SPCA ↗
  • Who funds MISFIT MANOR DOG RESCUE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SACKVILLE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FREDRICTON SPCA ↗
  • Who funds SPCA ST. JOHN'S ↗
  • Who funds PICK OF THE LITTER SOCIETY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Wesley and Patricia Armour Foundation Inc.NB13.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Wesley and Patricia Armour Foundation Inc. · United Way of Greater Moncton and Southeastern New Brunswick Region Inc\Centraide de la Region Du Grand Moncton Et Du Sud Est Du Nouveau-Brunswick Inc · United Way Maritimes/Centraide des Maritimes · Petsmart Charities of Canada - Charités Petsmart du Canada · Canfel Foundation · United Way/Centraide (Central N.B./Region Du Centre du N.B.)Inc. · BenefAction Foundation · United Way of Colchester County · United Way of Prince Edward Island · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Aqueduct Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 745808949:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Blue River’s filings →