Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Sherwood Park, AB · Charitable organization

The Bishop Budka Charitable Society

Donations to qualified and non-qualified donees aide to ukraine and brazil aide to ukrainian war evacuees

C$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$6k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$161k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ukrainian Canadian Congress Alberta Provincial CouncilC$5,500
Rotary Club of Sherwood ParkC$5,000
University of AlbertaC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$91k · 6 repeat orgsC$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +143% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

C$91k
C$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+143%
+6%

Still filing today

83%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF WESTERN CANADA
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$38k · revenue +143%
  • AR
    Amigo Relief Missions Ltd.
    2× · 2017–2023 · C$10k · revenue +287%
  • EF
    EMMANUEL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$10k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UC
    UKRAINIAN CANADIAN SOCIAL SERVICES (EDMONTON)
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue 0%
  • UC
    Ukrainian Canadian Congress - Edmonton Branch
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$5k
  • SB
    ST. BASIL'S UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canadian Foundation for Ukrainian Studies

Promoting ukrainian education in canada. the foundation adminsters various funds which promote scholarly studies publications and conferences through grants fellowships and awards

—
2
The Ukrainian Catholic Foundation of Canada Inc.
—
3
Canada's National Ukrainian Festival Inc.

Operates annual festival promoting art and culture of ukrainian people

—
4
Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Foundation Inc
—
5
Chair of Ukrainian Studies Foundation / La Fondation de la Chaire des Etudes Ukrainiennes

Provide scholarships to students for post secondary education and operate the canada ukraine parliamentary program

—
6
St Andrew's College in Winnipeg

Promote spiritual academic cultural and moral leadership with the ukrainian orthodox church of canada and the ukrainian canadian and canadian communities.

—
7
Ukrainian Canadian Research & Documentation Centre

Undertake and support educational research projects and publications relating to Ukrainian and Ukrainian Canadian historical themes.

—
8
Ukraine Millennium Foundation

All programs are funded by Alberta Casino gaming proceeds. UMF's primary mandate is to support the enhancement development and appreciation of Ukrainian musical arts.

—
9
Ukrainian Canadian Archives & Museum of Alberta

Preservation of the history and culture of Ukrainian pioneers in Canada through exhibitions of artifacts archival documents extensive library and workshops.

—
10
The Petro Jacyk Education Foundation

Promoted education in a wide variety of ukrainian studies by providing funds for scholarships and stipends to posts graduate students at educational institutions in canada and abroad to further studies in ukrainian heritage and history.

—
11
Ukrainian Music Society of Alberta

Umsa continues to advance the education and exposure of ukrainian music artists and composers through performance publication and informative events to benefit the multicultural fabric of canadian society such as two annual concerts. also…

—
12
Niagara Ukrainian Fund

The niagara ukrainian fund supports artistic cultural and educational activities and scholarships for ukrainian-canadians in niagara and provides economic support and settlement services for ukrainian newcomers to niagara

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukraninian Canadian Congress Charitable and Educational Trust and the most unlike its peers is The Governors of the University of Alberta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUKRAINIAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF WESTERN CANADA — C$38,270 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAmigo Relief Missions Ltd. — C$10,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetEMMANUEL FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA — C$10,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUKRAINIAN CANADIAN SOCIAL SERVICES (EDMONTON) — C$10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetST. BASIL'S UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCANADA-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROTARY CLUB SOUTH EDMONTON — C$5,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIATION CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUKRAINIAN CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUkrainian Foundation for College Education - Grant MacEwan U — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN CATHOLIC ARCHEPARCHY OF WINNIPEG — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN CANADIAN CONGRESS CHARITABLE & EDUCATIONAL TRUST — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Edmonton Communit…The John H and Marie …The Ed Stelmach Commu…United Way of the Alb…BenefAction FoundationStrategic Charitable …Charitable Gift Funds…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…United Way of Greater…Canadian Online Givin…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
The Edmonton Community Foundation Priv ActAB10.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Edmonton Community Foundation Priv Act · The John H and Marie Koziak Family Foundation · The Ed Stelmach Community Foundation · United Way of the Alberta Capital Region · BenefAction Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-04-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 131635419:2024-04-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bishop Budka Charitable Society’s filings →