Birch Hills, SK · Charitable organization
The Birch Hills Combined Appeal
An annual appeal for donations conducted by a mail-out of pledge sheets to all area households.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Birch Hills Fire Dept. | C$1,475 |
| Birch Hills Memorial Cemetery | C$1,085 |
| Birchview Home Auxillary | C$832 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$587 |
| Canadian Diabetes Association | C$502 |
| Birch Hills Library | C$432 |
| Birch Hills & Area Health Foundation | C$402 |
| Heart & Stroke Foundation of Sask. | C$317 |
| Canadian Red Cross | C$315 |
| Canadian Institute for the Blind | C$310 |
| Sask. Cancer Society | C$287 |
| Multiple Sclerosis Society | C$260 |
| Salvation Army | C$225 |
| Kidney Foundation of Canada, SK. Div. | C$207 |
| The Arthritis Society | C$195 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 23% of grant dollars (C$4k). The 77% that went abroad (C$14k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 77% of all-years giving (C$14k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CDCanadian Diabetes Association2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k
- BHBirch Hills Library2× · 2017–2018 · C$842
- HAHeart and Stroke Foundation of Sask.2× · 2017–2018 · C$797
Funded once
- BHBirch Hills Fire Dept c/o Town of Birch Hillsone grant, 2017 · C$1k
- BHBirch Hills Memorial Cemetery c/o Town of Birch Hillsone grant, 2017 · C$857
- WCWeldon Country Villagraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$628 · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.