Skip to content

Downsview, ON · Private foundation

The Bill and Judith Rubinstein Charitable Foundation

Selection of and disbursments to qualified donees

C$230k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$105k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$25k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$205k
C$50,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH APPEALC$105,000
BEIT MIDRASH ZICHRON DOVC$50,000
BNEI AKIVA SCHOOLSC$50,000
NETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOLC$25,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.4M · 5 repeat orgsC$202k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

C$2.4M
C$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$890k · revenue +98%
  • BA
    BNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$600k · revenue +111%
  • NH
    NETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$170k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CP
    CLANTON PARK SYNAGOGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$125k · revenue +235%
  • KC
    Kaylas Children Centre
    one grant, 2018 · C$36k · revenue -30%
  • C
    CJAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$24k · revenue +63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
Montessori Jewish Day School of Toronto

The purpose of the school is to integrate a first-rate montessori program with a rich and substantial jewish curriculum

—
3
Yeshiva Mishkan Yosef

To advance religion by establishing and maintaining a religious school of instruction on the subject of Judaism for youth. To advance education by establishing and operating a secondary school for Jewish youth. To advance education by…

—
4
The Canadian Jewish Educational Fund

The charity provides scholarships and promotes the study of judaism carrying out educational programming both in and out of schools, intensive study workshops and teacher training in biblical studies.

—
5
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
Jems - Jewish Education Matters

Jewish education

—
7
Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora

The charity maintained an elementary school for the teaching of the moral and religious principles of the jewish orthodox faith

—
8
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
9
Mifal Klita

Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…

—
10
Downtown Jewish Community School of Toronto

The school provides classes from junior kindergarten to high school with a curriculum that develops an understanding of Jewish heritage religion culture and traditions. The school serves the Jewish community within the proximity of…

—
11
Kollel of Ottawa and Centre for Jewish Education

To create and use technological and other creative means and to operate and maintain an educational centre to develop and deliver to students and to the public programs relating to jewish values history and religion.

—
12
Yeshiva Gedolah L'ecole D'etudes Superieures De Montreal

The charity opertes a school for jewish children

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Kayla's Children Centre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL — C$890,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBEIT MIDRASH ZICHRON DOV — C$710,000 over 7y, 36% of budgetBNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS — C$600,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetNETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL — C$170,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCLANTON PARK SYNAGOGUE — C$125,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetKaylas Children Centre — C$36,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCJA — C$24,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish National Fund — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$6,530 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShoresh Jewish Env. Programs — C$5,400 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Binah Charitable FoundationON8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Binah Charitable Foundation · The Robert and Renee Rubinstein Charitable Foundation · United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 132279241:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bill and Judith Rubinstein’s filings →