Skip to content

Steinbach, MB · Public foundation

The Bethesda Foundation Incorporated

Income distribution to promote welfare and good of any hospital personal care home institution organization entity of similar institution delivering health care services.

C$964k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$939k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$25k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$939k
C$939,424
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN RHAC$939,424
SOUTHEAST CANCER SUPPORT SERVICESC$25,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$10M · 3 repeat orgsC$315k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +188% since the first grant, against +79% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

C$10M
C$290k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+188%
+79%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HAVENGROUP FOUNDATION INC.
    3× · 2020–2022 · C$5.3M · revenue -80% · 89% of their budget
  • BW
    BETHESDA WELLNESS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$3.4M · revenue +188% · 33% of their budget
  • SR
    SOUTHERN RHA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.4M

Funded once

  • EH
    EDEN HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC.
    one grant, 2021 · C$250k · revenue +11%
  • SC
    STEINBACH COMMUNITY OUTREACHgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$40k · revenue +79%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHAVENGROUP FOUNDATION INC. — C$5,300,000 over 3y, 89% of budgetBETHESDA WELLNESS INC — C$3,440,578 over 3y, 33% of budgetEDEN HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC. — C$250,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetSTEINBACH COMMUNITY OUTREACH — C$40,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 119215762:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bethesda’s filings →