Digby, NS · Charitable organization
The Bethany Bargain Bin Society
Contribution to unkeep and support of families in need.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- C$10k–50k6 grants · C$115k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$356k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOCIETY OF OUR LADY SAINT MARY | C$355,847 |
| DIGBY AND AREA HEALTH SERVICE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | C$50,000 |
| DIGBY AND AREA FOOD BANK | C$35,000 |
| TRI-COUNTY REGIONAL CENTRE FOR EDUCATION | C$25,000 |
| JUNIPER HOUSE | C$20,000 |
| SOUTH SHORE FAMILY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION | C$15,000 |
| TRI-COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTRE CENTRE SOCIETY | C$10,000 |
| WEYMOUTH AREA FOOD BANK | C$10,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +158% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$75k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SOSOCIETY OF OUR LADY SAINT MARY6× · 2017–2022 · C$446k · revenue +94% · 27% of their budget
- DADIGBY AND AREA FOOD BANK6× · 2017–2022 · C$42k · revenue +158% · 46% of their budget
- TRTRI-COUNTY REGIONAL CENTRE FOR EDUCATION5× · 2017–2022 · C$26k · revenue ×790
Funded once
- DADIGBY AND AREA HEALTH SERVICE CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · C$50k · revenue -30%
- SSSOUTH SHORE FAMILY RESOURCE ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$15k · revenue +26%
- TWTRI-COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTRE CENTRE SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Local food bank
Provide food to families in need
The food bank is open for clients from seaforth and surrounding areas. a six day supply of food is given to each client. the food bank is open tuesdays (10am-12pm) and thursdays (1pm-3pm)
Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities
Operation of food bank and christmas dinner program
To provide food and gift hampers to needy families at christmas time
Relief of poverty providing food security to low income individuals and families
Food bank distribution
Providing Food Hampers to those who need it
Food bank
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-County Regional Centre for Education and the most unlike its peers is Society of Our Lady Saint Mary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOCIETY OF OUR LADY SAINT MARY ↗
- Who funds DIGBY AND AREA HEALTH SERVICE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIGBY AND AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY REGIONAL CENTRE FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIPER HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SHORE FAMILY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WEYMOUTH AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTRE CENTRE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Covenant House ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.