Skip to content

Saint-Laurent, QC · Private foundation

The Bensadoun Family Foundation La fondation de la famille Bensadoun

Investing of funds in sound investments of the nature permitted by law to be made in accordance with the objectives of the foundation that being to provide funding to qualified donees to assist charitable organizations.

C$518k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$375k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$7k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$36k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$100k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$375k
C$50,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEDERATION CJAC$375,000
THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTREALC$50,000
CONGREGATION SHAAR HASHOMAYIMC$50,000
CHAYA MUSHKA SEMINARYC$36,000
CENTRAIDE DU GRAND MONTREALC$5,000
ASSOCIATION QUEBECOISE DE VOILE ADAPTEE (AQVA)C$1,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$27M · 10 repeat orgsC$423k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
23

Total granted

C$27M
C$372k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$52k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MCGILL UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$25M · revenue +41%
  • FC
    FEDERATION CJA
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$1.3M · revenue +69%
  • JC
    Jewish Community Foundation
    2× · 2017–2024 · C$100k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • LC
    Lower Canada College
    one grant, 2017 · C$52k
  • MH
    MONTREAL HOLOCAUST MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$50k · revenue +412%
  • MF
    Miriam Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · C$50k · revenue -27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—
2
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
3
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
4
Fondation universitaire de l'école des hautes études commerciales de Montréal
—
5
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
6
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
7
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
8
Fondation Du Musee D'art Contemporain De Montreal

Versement de dons au musée d'art contemporain de montréal

—
9
Fondation de l'Orchestre Symphonique de Québec

Récompenser et encourager l'excellence la créativité et la détermination des artistes de la génération montante. dons à l'orchestre symphonique de québec

—
10
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—
11
Fondation de l'Orchestre Symphonique de Montréal

Recueillir des dons des legs ou d'autres contributions administrer ses éléments d'actif et organiser des campagnes de souscription afin d'encourager des projets éducatifs de formation et de sensibilisation du public à la musique dans le…

—
12
Grand Seminaire De Montreal
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants/the Montréal Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Chaya Mushka Seminary - Ben Weider Educational Centre - Chabad Seminary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMCGILL UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT — C$25,000,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFEDERATION CJA — C$1,335,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetJewish Community Foundation — C$100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAIDE OF GREATER MONTREAL — C$80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEGAL CENTRE FOR PERFORMING ARTS — C$75,600 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFondation Centre Philou — C$66,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCHAYA MUSHKA SEMINARY — C$61,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMONTREAL HOLOCAUST MUSEUM — C$50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMiriam Foundation — C$50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJewish Federations of Canada - UIA — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION SHAAR HASHOMAYIM — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMount Sinai Hospital Foundation — C$25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetJEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION NOTRE HOME FOUNDATION — C$25,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetNational Holocaust Monument — C$25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetOrchestre symphonique de Montreal — C$23,090 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Montreal Museum of Fine Arts — C$22,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE Foundation — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCanadian Centre for Architecture — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMontreal Heart Institute Foundation — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation CHU Sainte-Justice — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKanpe — C$5,700 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMcCord Museum — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAdaptive Sports Foundation — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCommunauté Sépharade unifiée du Québec — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAssociation de la Fibromyalgie — C$2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetASSOCIATION QUEBECOISE DE VOILE ADAPTEE (AQVA) — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMontreal Children's Hospital Foundation — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetToujours Ensemble — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRIS Montreal — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind GoodmanQC18.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Wcpd Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · The Sandra and Leo Kolber Foundation · Alvin Segal Family Foundation · The Richter Charitable Foundation · The Mireille and Murray Steinberg Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille Mireille et Muuray Steinberg · Claudine and Stephen Bronfman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Claudine et Stephen Bronfman · The Azrieli Foundation/La Fondation Azrieli · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Fondation de la famille Zeller

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 892749342:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bensadoun Family Foundation La fondation de la famille Bensadoun’s filings →