Hampstead, QC · Private foundation
The Barbara and David Zukor Charitable Foundation of Hampste
The foundation awards grants to other qualified donor recipients to enable them to carry on their work
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$22k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEM WORKSHOP INC | C$12,000 |
| MIZRACHI CANADA | C$7,500 |
| ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY | C$6,915 |
| HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION | C$5,000 |
| CANADIAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF TIBERIAS INC | C$2,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$19k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MCMIZRACHI CANADA2× · 2018–2024 · C$9k · revenue +343%
- HFHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION2× · 2022–2024 · C$7k · revenue -31%
- CFCANADIAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF TIBERIAS INC.2× · 2020–2024 · C$5k · revenue -54%
Funded once
- CTCONGREGATION TIFERETH BETH DAVID JERUSALEMone grant, 2018 · C$8k
- COCHABAD OF DOWN TOWN MONTREALgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$5k · revenue +115%
- CTCONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEFone grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.
Support of jewish education and institutions
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.
The charity furthered the practice of judaism by funding programs in mir yerushalayim including scholarships to deserving students to enable them to pursue religious studies at mir yerushalayim in jerusalem.
To advance religion by providing financial assistance to jewish boys and men interested in pursuing high religious studies.
The charity provides scholarship to needy students
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.
Provide scholarships and assistance to needy students
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mizrachi Organization of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Atelier Jem Inc./Jem Workshop Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEM WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds MIZRACHI CANADA ↗
- Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF DOWN TOWN MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF TIBERIAS INC. ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF ↗
- Who funds AUXILIARY OF THE JEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Federation Cja · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.