Skip to content

Hampstead, QC · Private foundation

The Barbara and David Zukor Charitable Foundation of Hampste

The foundation awards grants to other qualified donor recipients to enable them to carry on their work

C$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$22k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$12k
C$6,915
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$88k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEM WORKSHOP INCC$12,000
MIZRACHI CANADAC$7,500
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$6,915
HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATIONC$5,000
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF TIBERIAS INCC$2,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$21k · 3 repeat orgsC$36k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

C$21k
C$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-31%
+115%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$19k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIZRACHI CANADA
    2× · 2018–2024 · C$9k · revenue +343%
  • HF
    HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$7k · revenue -31%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF TIBERIAS INC.
    2× · 2020–2024 · C$5k · revenue -54%

Funded once

  • CT
    CONGREGATION TIFERETH BETH DAVID JERUSALEM
    one grant, 2018 · C$8k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF DOWN TOWN MONTREALgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$5k · revenue +115%
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Canadian Friends of Mercaz Hatorah

Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.

—
2
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
3
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
4
Mishmeret

During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.

—
5
Les Amis Canadiens Du Seminaire Yeshivah Mirer De Jerusalem Inc./Canadian Friends of the Seminary Yeshivah Mirer of Jerusalem

The charity furthered the practice of judaism by funding programs in mir yerushalayim including scholarships to deserving students to enable them to pursue religious studies at mir yerushalayim in jerusalem.

—
6
Canadian Friends of Yeshivat Lev Hatorah

To advance religion by providing financial assistance to jewish boys and men interested in pursuing high religious studies.

—
7
Canadian Friends of the Institute 0HOLEI Torah

The charity provides scholarship to needy students

—
8
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
9
Canadian Friends of Mesivta Torah V'yirah of U T a

Provide scholarships and assistance to needy students

—
10
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
11
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
12
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mizrachi Organization of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Atelier Jem Inc./Jem Workshop Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEM WORKSHOP INC — C$12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIZRACHI CANADA — C$9,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — C$6,800 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCHABAD OF DOWN TOWN MONTREAL — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF TIBERIAS INC. — C$5,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$2,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUXILIARY OF THE JEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND — C$720 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family FondationQC10.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Federation Cja · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-15, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 886974955:2024-12-15 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Barbara and David Zukor Charitable Foundation of Hampste’s filings →