Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Atkinson Martin Family Foundation

C$500k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k6 grants · C$150k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$100k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$250k
C$25,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMH FOUNDATIONC$250,000
ANISHNAWBE HEALTH FOUNDATIONC$50,000
VISIONS OF SCIENCEC$50,000
TORONTO FOUNDATIONC$25,000
FORT YORK FOOD BANKC$25,000
ONE CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDC$25,000
THE STOP COMMUNITY FOOD CENTREC$25,000
FOOD SHARE TORONTOC$25,000
DAILY BREAD FOOD BANKC$25,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.0M · 9 repeat orgsC$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

C$1.0M
C$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CAMH
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$500k · revenue +87%
  • VO
    VISIONS OF SCIENCE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$100k · revenue +25%
  • FY
    FORT YORK FOOD BANK
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$50k · revenue +48%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

    03Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Toronto Vegetarian Food Bank

    Operating the food bank to relieve poverty and food insecurity for those in need in Toronto

    —
    2
    FOOD4KIDS Toronto

    Providing healthy food packages to children aged 4 to 13 in the Toronto region who face food insecurity on weekends and during summer months. The program targets participants with limited or no access to food at home ensuring they receive…

    —
    3
    Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Foundation

    The toronto rehabilitation institute foundation's mission is to raise grant and steward funds to support the mission of the toronto rehabilitation institute (which is part of the university health network) to develop solutions for people…

    —
    4
    Toronto Educational Opportunity Fund

    The organization administers a nutritional education program in certain schools throughout the school year. the organization also contributes to the toronto foundation for student success which administers similar programs in schools.

    —
    5
    OneMeal Inc.

    Prepares and gives out food packages to homeless people in toronto

    —
    6
    Uhn Foundation

    We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

    —
    7
    Mississauga Foundation

    First the Foundation brings donors to the table as community builders helping them formulate and realize their philanthropic goals matching their interest and concerns with community needs and organizations and finding innovative and…

    —
    8
    Toronto Foundation for Student Success

    Financial administration fundraising and program development for: 1) Student Nutrition Programs serving the Toronto area; 2) Beyond 3:30 initiative to support inner city communities that provide programming focused on healthy living arts…

    —
    9
    Toronto Botanical Garden

    To enable Toronto Botanical Garden's mission vision and values: Mission Toronto Botanical Garden connects people and plants fostering sustainable communities and developing reciprocal relationships with nature through lifelong learning.

    —
    10
    Right to Food

    Community Food Centres Canada (CFCC) builds and supports vibrant food-focused organizations in low-income communities across the country that bring people together to grow cook share and advocate for policies that improve the health and…

    —
    11
    Food Banks Mississauga

    We lead our agency network to realize a food-secure Mississauga by providing and promoting access to healthy and appropriate food. We provide emergency food so neighbours in need have food TODAY. We advocate for government policies and…

    —
    12
    Meal Exchange

    Provide access to food for the most vulnerable post secondary students empower and support students to get access to healthy food on campus

    —

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Daily Bread Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Visions of Science Network for Learning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    02the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

    Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    5/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMH — C$500,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVISIONS OF SCIENCE — C$100,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetANISHNAWBE HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$100,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFOODSHARE — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFORT YORK FOOD BANK — C$50,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetONE CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND — C$50,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetDAILY BREAD FOOD BANK — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO FOUNDATION FOR BLACK & INDIGENOUS FUTURES FUND — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STOP — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Toronto FoundationON7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Toronto Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

    Source object 780112405:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

    Play a game based on Atkinson Martin Family’s filings →