Skip to content
Canadian charities

Uxbridge, ON · Private foundation

The Anderson Family Foundation

The organization will make gifts to qualified donees selected by the organization's trustees accordingly to such criteria as the trustees may establish from time to time pursuant to the terms of the trust agreement.

C$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$15k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$30k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$913k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UXBRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$20,000
HALIBURTON HIGHLANDS HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATIONC$10,000
WHITCHURCH STOUFFVILLE FOOD BANKC$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES TORONTOC$5,000
BLUE DOOR SUPPORT SERVICESC$2,500
THE LOAVES AND FISHES FOODBANKC$2,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$93k · 3 repeat orgsC$46k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +132% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

C$93k
C$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+132%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UXBRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$60k · revenue +132%
  • HH
    HALIBURTON HIGHLANDS HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$20k · revenue +133%
  • BD
    BLUE DOOR CARE OF THE GOOD FOOD IMPACT
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$13k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • TD
    TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +17%
  • FB
    FIGHTING BLINDNESS CANADA
    one grant, 2020 · C$8k
  • FB
    FIGHTING BLINDNESS CANADA
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k · revenue -17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Toronto Vegetarian Food Bank

Operating the food bank to relieve poverty and food insecurity for those in need in Toronto

—
2
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
3
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Foundation

The toronto rehabilitation institute foundation's mission is to raise grant and steward funds to support the mission of the toronto rehabilitation institute (which is part of the university health network) to develop solutions for people…

—
4
North Bay Regional Health Centre Foundation

Primary goal is to provide funds for patient-focused care education and research for the benefit of the patients of Nipissing region of Northeastern Ontario. Encourage and administer donations to enhance and improve the services to the…

—
5
Fund Homecare Canada

Fund Homecare Canada is a Canadian registered charitable not-for-profit organization dedicated to making in-home care accessible to palliative cancer patients—a critical and prevalent need that is unfortunately out of reach for many. We…

—
6
North and Central Frontenac Food Bank Inc.

To operate a food bank for the benefit of people in the North and Central Frontenac area who are experiencing poverty

—
7
Huron County Food Bank Distribution Centre Inc.

The Huron County Food Bank Distribution Centre (HCFBDC)’s purpose is to source and supply food and hygiene products for distribution to the food banks and aid agencies that we serve in Huron and Perth Counties. We also run a monthly Mobile…

—
8
FOOD4KIDS Toronto

Providing healthy food packages to children aged 4 to 13 in the Toronto region who face food insecurity on weekends and during summer months. The program targets participants with limited or no access to food at home ensuring they receive…

—
9
Toronto Foundation

The purpose of toronto foundation is to create a more fair and justice society where everyone can thrive by mobilizing those with resources and the will to partner with others. the foundation publishes research including the toronto's…

—
10
Peterborough Regional Health Centre Foundation

The Peterborough Regional Health Centre Foundation raises funds and manages donor gifts for the purpose of supporting outstanding patient care at the Peterborough Regional Health Centre. This includes raising funds for identified capital…

—
11
StayWell Suites Charity

StayWell’s mission is to support healthcare access for patients of all ages throughout Canada including the GTA who must relocate to Toronto for critical medical care unavailable in their community. Through our reduced-cost initiatives…

—
12
Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation

Raise manage and distribute funds in support of our hospitals and cancer centre for patient care research education equipment renovations and capital expenditures.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whitchurch Stouffville Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Uxbridge Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUXBRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$60,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHALIBURTON HIGHLANDS HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — C$20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBLUE DOOR CARE OF THE GOOD FOOD IMPACT — C$12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIGHTING BLINDNESS CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHITCHURCH STOUFFVILLE FOOD BANK — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPOWER HOCKEY TORONTO — C$5,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES TORONTO — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOAH'S CLUBHOUSE — C$2,500 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLONDON FOOD BANK — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOAVES AND FISHES FOODBANK — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Foundation of …Charities Aid Foundat…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Jewish Foundation of Greater TorontoON7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 724846514:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Anderson Family’s filings →