Skip to content

Thedford, ON · Charitable organization

The Algarva Charity Council

Assistance to members of the community with intellectual disabilities and their care givers.

C$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$350k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONGOING LIVING AND LEARNING INC.C$8,548
FRIENDS OF PINERY PARKC$5,000
COMMUNITY LIVING SOUTH HURONC$4,864
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$148k · 12 repeat orgsC$47k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

C$148k
C$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+15%

Still filing today

75%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Lambton County Developmental Services
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$32k · revenue +33%
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LIVING SARNIA LAMBTON
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$19k · revenue +67%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS ADVOCATES
    5× · 2018–2023 · C$13k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOREST FRITTER
    one grant, 2023 · C$9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · C$6k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PINERY PARKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Living Essex County

Community living essex county provides a range of supports and services enabling people with intellectual disability to live in their community. community participation supports includes employment volunteering educational recreational and…

—
2
Community Living London

Community living london provides a wide variety of supports to adults and children with developmental disabilities. these include: accomodation for adults; job creation and support for individuals in competitive employment; community…

—
3
Community Living Windsor

Provide services for people with developmental disabilities - group homes employment supports education advocacy day supports and assistance administering direct funding.

—
4
Community Living Chatham-Kent

A7 Services ans supports for people who have an intellectual disability and their families Employment Respite Accommodations Life Skills and Day Program Supports

—
5
Community Living Brant

Community living brant assists and supports people with developmental disabilities. community living brant operates a variety of accommodation programs (such as group homes life share supported living) employment supports and day supports…

—
6
Learning Disabilities Association of Windsor-Essex County

Comprehensive services include information and referral access to a lending library social skills development for children and youth literacy and math tutoring technology training engaging summer camps transition planning recreational…

—
7
Community Living Central York

Provide services and support for individuals with developmental disabilities. These services include residential supports supported independent living employment supports and day programming.

—
8
Community Living Toronto

Community Living Toronto provides a variety of innovative supports to children youth and adults with an intellectual disability and their families. Our person-centered services and supports aim to foster natural community networks and…

—
9
Accessible Housing London

Housing: (low - income accessibility)

—
10
The Learning Disabilities Association - London Region

Our organization offers programs and services to help children/youth with a learning disability and/or adhd to be successful. our catchment area is within the city of london and in middlesex elgin oxford huron and perth counties in…

—
11
Community Living Welland Pelham

The organization provides services and supports for individuals with developmental disabilities. community living welland pelham provides residential settings supported employment job placements family supports preschool resources public…

—
12
Community Living Association (Lanark County)

Support adults and transitional aged youth with intellectual disabilities

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Living Sarnia-Lambton and the most unlike its peers is The Friends of Pinery Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLambton County Developmental Services — C$32,405 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING SARNIA LAMBTON — C$18,635 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLONDON DOWNS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION — C$14,270 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetST FRANCIS ADVOCATES — C$13,160 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAYS HEALTH CENTRE — C$12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING SOUTH HURON — C$8,744 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF PINERY PARK — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetThames Valley District School Board — C$4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY LIVING — C$2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetL'ARCHE LONDON — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMartyr's Shrine — C$800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLambton Kent District School Board — C$565 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSt.Christopher's Parish — C$200 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lambton County Developmental Services ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LIVING SARNIA LAMBTON ↗
  • Who funds LONDON DOWNS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS HEALTH CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LIVING SOUTH HURON ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PINERY PARK ↗
  • Who funds Thames Valley District School Board ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY LIVING ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES ESSEX KENT LAMBTON INC. ↗
  • Who funds L'ARCHE LONDON ↗
  • Who funds Martyr's Shrine ↗
  • Who funds Lambton Kent District School Board ↗
  • Who funds St.Christopher's Parish ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Sarnia-LambtonON7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Sarnia-Lambton · Sarnia Community Foundation · United Way of Chatham-Kent · Td Friends of the Environment Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-01-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 119211878:2024-01-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Algarva Charity Council’s filings →