Skip to content
Canadian charities

Thornhill, ON · Private foundation

The Algaledael Charitable Trust

Purpose is to make donations in an orderly fashion to qualified donees.

C$5k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$821k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEVELOPING AND NURTURING INDEPENDENCEC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$216k · 8 repeat orgsC$150k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

C$216k
C$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+132%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PATHS OF TORAH
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$79k · revenue +61%
  • N
    NCSY
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$28k · revenue +133%
  • DA
    DEVELOPING AND NURTURING INDEPENDENCE
    4× · 2018–2021 · C$18k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS FOR YAD ELIZER
    one grant, 2019 · C$54k · revenue -43%
  • TB
    TIFERES BAIS YAAKOVgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$36k · revenue +43%
  • KO
    Kollel Ohr Yosefgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$25k · revenue +373%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Institute of Torah Study

Jewish education for women part-time education for ladies / religious education

—
2
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
3
Jewish Educational Services

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith.

—
4
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
5
Young Jewish Professionals

Provide classes and seminars to jeiwsh professionals in the areas of jewish religious tenents doctrines and observances

—
6
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
7
Friends of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah

Initiatives that advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith

—
8
Yedidut Torah Foundation

The foundation operates programs to promote religious study and foster successful religious outreach.

—
9
Torah in Motion

Jewish education on-line and by public lectures and conferences.

—
10
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
11
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
12
Experience Juive / Jewish Experience

To promote and encourage jewish education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paths of Torah School and the most unlike its peers is Link Yad Chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPATHS OF TORAH — C$79,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS FOR YAD ELIZER — C$53,702 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV — C$36,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKH MEOROTH — C$34,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBeth Oloth Charitable Organization — C$31,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNCSY — C$28,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKollel Ohr Yosef — C$25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$22,900 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetDEVELOPING AND NURTURING INDEPENDENCE — C$17,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEitz Chaim Schools — C$13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJLIC — C$10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetAteres Mordechai — C$7,200 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLink Yad Chesed — C$4,600 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAISH HATORAH — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

My Charity FundThe Gra Charitable Tr…The Ff Charitable Tru…Jack and Doris Bistri…Moral Arc FoundationRayjo Charitable TrustJewish Foundation of …Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
My Charity FundON8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: My Charity Fund · The Gra Charitable Trust · The Ff Charitable Trust · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2021-11-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2021. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 809663669:2021-11-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Algaledael’s filings →