Montreal, QC · Private foundation
The 2% Solution Foundation
To receive funds or contributions for the purpose of assisting establishing or maintaining charitable organizations whose activities are exclusively for charitable purposes.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MONTREAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$2,815 |
| MAKE-A-WISH CANADA | C$1,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MFMASONIC FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · C$181k · revenue +14%
- SHSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN3× · 2021–2023 · C$109k · revenue +19%
- MCMAKE-A-WISH CANADA2× · 2023–2024 · C$4k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- MHMONTREAL HOSPITALone grant, 2022 · C$180k · revenue -44%
- CSCANCER SOCIETY RESEARCHgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$30k · revenue +69%
- TLTHE LAMPE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · C$15k · revenue -50%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
Make grants directed to the care and treatment of respiratory diseases at the mcgill university health centre
La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal
Dons à des donataires reconnus
La fondation de l'institut de cardiologie de ontréal recueille et administre des fonds pour soutenir la recherche la prévention et l'enseignement prodigués par l'institut de cardiologie de montréal. elle encourage ainsi l'excellence d'une…
Contribuer à l'amélioration de la qualité des soins et des services offerts à la clientèle et à la promotion de la santé dans la communauté en soutenant financièrement le développement de l'hôpital jean-talon et du ciusss du…
Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants/the Montréal Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Nova Hudson. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MASONIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTREAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds THE LAMPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ESTRIE ↗
- Who funds FRASER RECOVERY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE SITN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FONDATION 24H ↗
- Who funds THE MONTREAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAYMOND JAMES CANADA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LE PONT / BRIDGING ↗
- Who funds NOVA HUDSON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: La Fondation Maçonnique Du Québec/The Masonic Foundation of Québec · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.