Toronto, ON · Charitable organization
Talmudical Academy Of Toronto Mishkan HaTorah Charitable Trust
Operate a school to provide religious education in accordance with orthodox jewish tradition.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$17k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$31k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE | C$31,250 |
| KAV SHALOM KHM | C$7,900 |
| BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | C$5,000 |
| MAAYANOS TORAH | C$3,600 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$48k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BCBNOS CHAYA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL7× · 2017–2023 · C$186k · revenue +77%
- BBBNOS BAIS YAKOV HIGH SCHOOL7× · 2017–2023 · C$78k · revenue +109%
- YGYESHIVA GEDOLA BRIDGEPORT OF CANADA FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2023 · C$61k · revenue +335%
Funded once
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$745 · revenue +423%
- YYYESHIVAT YESODEI HATORAHone grant, 2023 · C$75 · revenue +12%
- OTOHEL TORAH CONGREGATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$47 · revenue +336%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.
Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.
Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
The organization has been set up to provide religious education.
Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.
The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bnos Chaya and the most unlike its peers is Ohel Torah Congregation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BNOS CHAYA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BNOS BAIS YAKOV HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLA BRIDGEPORT OF CANADA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOBOV YESHIVA BNEI ZION OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds KAV SHALOM KHM ↗
- Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MAAYANOS TORAH ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORAH ↗
- Who funds OHEL TORAH CONGREGATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Heitner Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.