London, ON · Public foundation
Talbot Street Christian Reformed Church Foundation
The foundation disburses grants to specific christian projects.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADIAN MISSION AID CANADA | C$3,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TSTalbot Street Christian Reformed Church3× · 2017–2022 · C$17k · revenue +14%
- CACANADIAN AID FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN3× · 2017–2020 · C$7k · revenue -71%
- CMCHRISTIAN MISSION AID CANADA2× · 2021–2023 · C$4k · revenue -63%
Funded once
- GCGREAT COMMISSION FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue +39%
- CRChristian Reformed Church of North Americaone grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue -16%
- CSCHRISTIAN STEWARDSHIP SERVICESone grant, 2020 · C$50 · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Talbot Street Christian Reformed Church ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN AID FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN MISSION AID CANADA ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN MISSION AID CANADA ↗
- Who funds GREAT COMMISSION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Christian Reformed Church of North America ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN STEWARDSHIP SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.