North York, ON · Charitable organization
Tagalog Circuit 2B of Jehovah's Witnesses
To assist the local unincorporated association of jehovah's witnesses in carrying out their religious objective of preaching the good news of god's kingdom and promoting public religious worship designed to uplift jehovah's witnesses and any who attend their public meetings by means of moral and spiritual instruction based on god's word…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF CANADA | C$9,919 |
| UNIVERSITY CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES | C$6,000 |
| GLENCREST CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES | C$1,161 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 83% of grant dollars (C$64k). The 17% that went abroad (C$13k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 17% of all-years giving (C$13k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUniversity Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses3× · 2021–2023 · C$15k · revenue +48%
- AHASSEMBLY HALL OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES3× · 2018–2020 · C$14k · revenue -78%
- TCTAGALOG CIRCUIT 2A OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES3× · 2018–2020 · C$11k · revenue -78% · 33% of their budget
Funded once
- JWJehovah's Witnesses Circuit Florida 58-Aone grant, 2017 · C$13k
- MAMontreal Assembly Hall of Jehovah's Witnessesone grant, 2017 · C$13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.