Toronto, ON · Charitable organization
Sunnybrook Research Institute
Sunnybrook Research Institute (SRI) is the research arm of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (SHSC) a teaching hospital fully affiliated with the University of Toronto.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$24k
- C$10k–50k14 grants · C$291k
- C$50k–250k5 grants · C$668k
- C$250k+8 grants · C$5.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONAVI MEDICAL INC | C$1,195,152 |
| PULSEMEDICA CORP | C$1,051,746 |
| COSM MEDICAL CORP | C$1,036,867 |
| VITAA MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC | C$755,869 |
| CIRCLE CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING INC | C$634,389 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$463,119 |
| SONIC INCYTES MEDICAL CORP | C$269,285 |
| DAXSONICS ULTRASOUND INC | C$258,304 |
| LUXSONIC TECHNOLOGIES INC | C$180,996 |
| 16 BIT INC | C$164,187 |
| FUJIFILM VISUALSONICS INC | C$136,007 |
| ARRAYUS TECHNOLOGIES INC | C$126,782 |
| NZ TECHNOLOGIES INC | C$60,510 |
| QUICKER INSTRUMENTS INC | C$47,453 |
| MIMOSA DIAGNOSTICS INC | C$34,343 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 2% of grant dollars (C$169k). The 98% that went abroad (C$6.6M) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 98% of all-years giving (C$6.6M)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6.6M went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TGTHE GAIRDNER FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · C$98k · revenue +103%
- UOUniversity of Toronto7× · 2017–2024 · C$51k · revenue +43%
- LTLET'S TALK SCIENCE5× · 2017–2021 · C$5k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- RCRESEARCH CANADAone grant, 2023 · C$5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.