Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Steinbach, MB · Charitable organization

Steinbach United Church

The primary purpose of our charity is to promote the teachings of jesus christ.

C$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$18k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$350
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$18k
C$225
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$178k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADAC$18,037
SANDY-SAULTREAUX SPIRITUAL CENTERC$225
AGAPE HOUSEC$125
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$143k · 6 repeat orgsC$600 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

C$143k
C$600

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+41%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$138k · revenue +22%
  • AH
    AGAPE HOUSE
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$625 · revenue +136%
  • SS
    SANDY-SAULTREAUX SPIRITUAL CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$475 · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • MC
    MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$400 · revenue +41%
  • SA
    ST ANDREWS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · C$100 · revenue -4%
  • AT
    AGAPE TABLEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$100 · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eden Health Care Services Inc

Organization provides management and administrative support to a group of companies who provide wrap around mental health services in southern manitoba. the services include a mental health centre residential housing and supports…

—
2
Indwell Community Homes

Indwell creates and operates affordable housing communities that support people seeking health wellness and belonging. Indwell's affordable supportive housing programs primarily support individuals with low incomes and disabilities…

—
3
Mennonite Central Committee (Mcc) British Columbia

Forwards funds to Mennonite Central Committee Canada to support international relief. Warehouse collects and ships clothing/blankets/food/medical supplies to Mennonite Central Committee Canada for forwarding to other countries. Partners…

—
4
House Blend Ministries Inc.

To create communities through whole life Christian discipleship with an among residents of inner city neighbourhoods in Winnipeg. To operate a community-oriented Christian religious order in Winnipeg in association with MBCM. The…

—
5
Eden Community Homes

Eden community homes provides supportive housing for ex-psychiatric patients. the program offers permanent housing which is under the tenant protection act. each resident has his or her own bedroom and contributes to a food program. eden…

—
6
Mennonite Central Committee Canada

Please see our website and within the tab 'Learn More' there is a section entitled 'What We Do'. In every country where MCC works we partner with local churches and organizations with similar values. Together we work in three areas:…

—
7
Southwest Community Options Inc.

Operated a number of residences for mentally challenged individuals

—
8
United College

United college is affiliated with the university of waterloo ( uw). it's program include residential accomodation for undergraduate and graduate students and teaching religious studies international development indigenous studies…

—
9
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
10
Mennonite Central Committee (Saskatchewan)

Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) is a global non-profit organization that strives to share God's love and compassion through relief development and peacebuilding. MCC Saskatchewan supports the international relief development and peace…

—
11
Eden Residential Care Services Inc.

Provide affordable housing and mental health supports for those in need

—
12
Interdenominational Christian Counselling Inc.

Individual couple and family counseling internship training program employee assistance for christian charities psychotherapy and counselling education subsidy program for marginalized clients and those affected by the covid-19 pandemic

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Church of Canada and the most unlike its peers is The Bethesda Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA — C$138,156 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BETHESDA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — C$2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BETHESDA FOUNDATION INCORAPORATED — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE HOUSE — C$625 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY-SAULTREAUX SPIRITUAL CENTER — C$475 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FOOD BANK — C$250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREWS COLLEGE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE TABLE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg Foundati…Abundance CanadaPayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
The Winnipeg FoundationMB7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · Abundance Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 108013616:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Steinbach United Church’s filings →