Boissevain, MB · Charitable organization
St Pauls United Church
Religious organization conducting weekly worship sunday school wedding ceremonies funerals and baptisms.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED CHURCH - MISSION & SERVICE FUND | C$8,532 |
| ROCK LAKE UNITED CHURCH CAMP | C$200 |
| ST. ANDREW'S COLLEGE | C$200 |
| BOISSEVAIN RESETTLEMENT COMMITTEE | C$200 |
| SANDY-SAULTEAUX SPIRITUAL CENTRE INC. | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUnited Church - Mission & Service Fund8× · 2017–2024 · C$88k · revenue +22%
- RLRock Lake United Church Camp, Inc.7× · 2018–2024 · C$2k · revenue -28%
- BRBOISSEVAIN RESETTLEMENT COMMITTEE7× · 2018–2024 · C$1k · revenue -55%
Funded once
- CBCanadian Bible Societygraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$100 · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Church - Mission & Service Fund ↗
- Who funds Rock Lake United Church Camp, Inc. ↗
- Who funds BOISSEVAIN RESETTLEMENT COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds St Andrew's College ↗
- Who funds PRAIRIE TO PINE REGIONAL COUNCIL-UCW BURSARY ↗
- Who funds SANDY-SAULTEAUX SPIRITUAL CENTRE INC. ↗
- Who funds Canadian Bible Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.