Skip to content

North Bay, ON · Charitable organization

St Pauls United Church

No programs available due to Covid restrictions

C$7k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
1
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$775
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$253k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARATHON PASTORAL CHARGEC$5,000
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADAC$1,085
ALGOMA PRESBYTERY UNITED CHURCH OF CANADAC$775
THE LEPROSY MISSION OF CANADA-EFFECT HOPEC$100
CAMP MACDOUGALLC$100
MANITOUWADGE HANDI-ACTIONC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$19k · 7 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

C$19k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+23%

Still filing today

86%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United Church of Canada
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$7k · revenue +22%
  • TN
    The Navigators of Canada
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$3k · revenue +8%
  • MH
    Manitouwadge Handi-Action
    2× · 2017–2022 · C$1k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • MH
    Manitouwadge Handi-Action Group/Food Bank
    one grant, 2019 · C$1k
  • SM
    Sante Manitouwadge Health
    one grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue +23%
  • CM
    Camp McDougall
    one grant, 2019 · C$140

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Margate Pastoral Charge/United Church of Canada

Provide financial and spiritual support to the members of the congregation. support is also given to summer camp and missin and services under the umbrella of the united church of canada. provide worship services.

—
2
Lake of Bays Pastoral Charge

Regular Church Services in 3 communities and 1 summer community COMMUNITY Outreach Support the United Church of Canada Mission and Service Programs Food Rescue

—
3
Montague Pastoral Charge

Donations to united church missions & services-outreach provide food for food bank & monthly free lunch-hold worship services weekly-provide pastoral care.

—
4
Gander Pastoral Charge

We hold weekly worship services that focus on holistic care of both spiritual mental and physical health. We offer on-going Pastoral Care and Outreach Services including programs to lessen isolation and increase connectivity. We provide…

—
5
United Church Outdoor Ministries-Hamilton Conference

Provides christian summer camping for youth and families -provides leadership training for future leaders

—
6
Andrew Donald Pastoral Charge

1) we provide pastoral care (ministry services) to the two congregations in the pastoral charge (75%) 2) we financially support social outreach activities by gifting funds to our denomination headquarters the united church of canada which…

—
7
Cambrian Presbytery of the United Church of Canada

CAMBRIAN PRESBYTERY, AN AFFIRMING AND INCLUSIVE COURT OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA IN NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO SERVES GOD THROUGH THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT BY: THE NURTURING OF, CELEBRATING WITH, AND PROVIDING OVERSIGHT TO PASTORAL…

—
8
The Greater Napanee & District Christian Ministerial Association

Pastoral care at hospitals

—
9
Mcculloch United Church

~ provided pastoral care to congregation ~ donated funds to Mission and Service - The United Church of Canada's Outreach Programme

—
10
Lanigan Pastoral Charge

Weekly worship services; Sunday School; Bible Study; Pastoral care; Visiting the sick and shut-ins in hospital or in their homes; Prayer Chain; Conducting worship and visiting at our local seniors' home; Regular Communion; Support of local…

—
11
Baddeck Pastoral Charge

To support the work of the united church of canada

—
12
Camp Tapawingo Tamarack Presbytery United Church of Canada Inc.

To provide a summer camp facility to carry out a christian camping program

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Navigators of Canada and the most unlike its peers is The Leprosy Mission Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe United Church of Canada — C$6,710 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARATHON PASTORAL CHARGE — C$5,723 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetThe Navigators of Canada — C$2,740 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAlgoma Presbytery, United Church of Canada — C$2,538 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetManitouwadge Handi-Action — C$1,100 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetSante Manitouwadge Health — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp McDougall — C$315 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLeprosy Effect:Hope — C$275 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The United Church of Canada ↗
  • Who funds MARATHON PASTORAL CHARGE ↗
  • Who funds The Navigators of Canada ↗
  • Who funds Algoma Presbytery, United Church of Canada ↗
  • Who funds Manitouwadge Handi-Action ↗
  • Who funds Sante Manitouwadge Health ↗
  • Who funds Camp McDougall ↗
  • Who funds Leprosy Effect:Hope ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadahelps CanadonON2.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 108037706:2022-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on St Pauls United Church’s filings →