Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Golden Lake, ON · Charitable organization

St John's Evangelical Lutheran Church Bonnechere

Charitable purpose is to provide a place of worship and fellowship in a christian setting and provide an ongoing ministry for the word of god.

C$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$12k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$4k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$12k
C$500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$196k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCHC$11,688
EASTEN SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN CANADAC$2,285
MADAWASKA VALLEY HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CAREC$500
HOSPICE RENFREW INCC$500
THE EVANGELICAL AND DISTRICT COMMUNITY FOOD BANKC$500
KILLALOE FOOD BANKC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$107k · 6 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +117% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

C$107k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$62k · revenue +152%
  • TE
    THE EGANVILLE AND DISTRICT COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +117%
  • HR
    HOSPICE RENFREW INC.
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • LC
    LUTHERLYN CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTRE
    one grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue +22%
  • HR
    HOSPICE RENFREW INC.
    one grant, 2020 · C$500
  • MS
    MIDJM/THE SHARING PLACE FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$500 · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elgin Food Bank

Collecting and dispersing food for local residents

—
2
St. Thomas Elgin Food Bank

Operation of food bank for people in need

—
3
Viking Food Bank

Provide emergency food relief to residents of eastern beaver county including incorporated communties. we assist those in financial difficulty. we participate with other agencies providing chrismas hampers. we also participate with other…

—
4
Rossland Food Bank

Dispensing food

—
5
Wildwood Evansburg Entwistle Community Food Bank Society

Food collection and distribution to local residents in need of food assistance.

—
6
Markdale and District Food Bank Board

Provide food hampers on a bi-monthly basis provide emergency food hampers and food vouchers as needed

—
7
Northumberland County Foodbanks

Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities

—
8
Lanigan & District Food Bank Inc

Distribute food to those in need throughout the year

—
9
Havelock Food Bank

Food distribution plus emergency orders as required

—
10
Deer Lake Regional Food Bank

Food hampers (collecting storing and distributing food to families in need)

—
11
Stittsville Food Bank

Food bank

—
12
Macklin & District Food Bank & Secret Santa Association

Providing families with food hampers christmas gifts or emergency help

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Lutheran Church and the most unlike its peers is Hospice Renfrew Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH — C$61,576 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetEastern Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada — C$32,799 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EGANVILLE AND DISTRICT COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — C$3,910 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetHOSPICE RENFREW INC. — C$3,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKILLALOE FOOD BANK — C$2,750 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetMADAWASKA VALLEY HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE — C$2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERLYN CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTRE — C$500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ottawa Valley Communi…My Tribute Gift Found…United Way East Ontar…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
Ottawa Valley Community FoundationON9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ottawa Valley Community Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119180560:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on St John's Evangelical Lutheran Church Bonnechere’s filings →