Kelwood, MB · Charitable organization
St John's Church
We offer church services to the public open to weddings & funerals.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SALVATION ARMY NEEPAWA BRANCH | C$500 |
| CANADIAN RED CROSS - NATIONAL PROCESSING CENTRE | C$200 |
| SILOAM MISSIONS | C$200 |
| PWRDF (NOW ALONGSIDE HOPE) | C$150 |
| HARVEST MB. | C$100 |
| WORLD VISION | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SASALVATION ARMY6× · 2019–2024 · C$3k · revenue +84%
- SMSILOAM MISSION6× · 2019–2024 · C$2k · revenue +38%
- PPWRDF6× · 2019–2024 · C$1k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- SMST MARKS ANGLICAN CHURCHone grant, 2021 · C$300 · revenue -8%
- WHWINNIPEG HARVESTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$100 · revenue +49%
- AFANGLICAN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · C$50 · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…
Islamic Relief Canada carries out humanitarian and development programs in over 30 countries. Programs include: • Livelihoods focused on climate-adaptive support and/or economic empowerment; • Health including water sanitation and hygiene…
ADRA is the global humanitarian agency of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Globally the ADRA network provides assistance to individuals in over 120 countries regardless of their ethnicity religion or political affiliation. ADRA Canada…
Tearfund is passionate to see all people freed from poverty living transformed lives and reaching their god-given potential. firmly affirming national leadership we collaborate with church-based partners across the global south to fix the…
Cooperation Canada is Canada's national association of international development and humanitarian organizations. Cooperation Canada brings together and advocates for effective Canadian international development assistance by convening…
Relieving poverty in developing nations by providing food and other necessities of life including access to education for children of families who are poor of low income or in need.
The Humanitarian Coalition contributes towards alleviating acute human suffering among survivors of humanitarian disasters. As a joint Canadian approach to humanitarian response the Humanitarian Coalition is a 'one-stop-shop' for all…
Please see our website and within the tab 'Learn More' there is a section entitled 'What We Do'. In every country where MCC works we partner with local churches and organizations with similar values. Together we work in three areas:…
Oxfam canada this year spanned 21 countries focusing on various humanitarian and development initiatives. in jamaica we address gender-based violence (gbv) through social norm changes and advocacy. in nicaragua we empower civil society for…
Created by Parliament in 1970 IDRC has been committed in supporting research in developing countries undertaken by the people of those countries for their own development. IDRC has five areas of focus: Climate-Resilient Food Systems Global…
The Canadian Foodgrains Bank is a partnership of Canadian churches and church-based agencies working to end hunger in developing countries. The charitable programs include provision of food to hungry people funding of programs to improve…
1. Provision of financial support to overseas development projects in developing countries. 2. Provision of assistance to refugees for immigration and settlement in Canada. 3. Provision of aid to disaster-stricken countries. 4. Provision…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Canada-Vision Mondiale Canada and the most unlike its peers is The Synod of the Diocese of Brandon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.