Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization
St John Brebeuf Parish
Provide ministries for all people for the purpose of advancing Roman Catholic worship instruction and ministry; perform pastoral work; provide elementary/middle school education and related services; provide and maintain buildings for worship and other religious and community use; organize and provide religious worship and instruction.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$7k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST. JOHN BREBEUF SCHOOL INC. | C$25,000 |
| Roman Catholic Archiepiscopal Corporation of Winnipeg | C$7,203 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$25k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RCRoman Catholic Archiepiscopal Corporation of Winnipeg7× · 2018–2024 · C$54k · revenue +11%
- WHWinnipeg Harvest3× · 2017–2019 · C$3k · revenue +176%
- ATAgape Table3× · 2017–2019 · C$3k · revenue +132%
Funded once
- DADevelopment and Peaceone grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue -54%
- PMPalliative Manitobaone grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +7%
- ADAccountable Development Worksgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +441%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operates a palliative care hospice in winnipeg
to provide child care services in the City of Winnipeg
Providing subsidized rental housing to low-income families; developing neighbourhood strategies for lower income households
The organization operates to provide child care services in the city of winnipeg
Rmhc manitoba supports the health and well-being of children by providing a 'home-away-from-home' and other essential servicces for critically ill chronically ill and seriously injured children and their families
Operation of a crisis pregnancy centre and activities ancillary thereby for the general benefit of the community.
To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba.
To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba
To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba
To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba.
To provide montessori pre-school program on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba.
To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roman Catholic Archiepiscopal Corporation of Winnipeg and the most unlike its peers is Accountable Development Works. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Roman Catholic Archiepiscopal Corporation of Winnipeg ↗
- Who funds ST. JOHN BREBEUF SCHOOL INC. ↗
- Who funds Chez Nous ↗
- Who funds Development and Peace ↗
- Who funds Winnipeg Harvest ↗
- Who funds Agape Table ↗
- Who funds Palliative Manitoba ↗
- Who funds ROSSBROOK HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds VILLA ROSA INC. ↗
- Who funds Our Lady of Victory School Inc. ↗
- Who funds Accountable Development Works ↗
- Who funds Future Hope Inc. ↗
- Who funds Gonzaga Middle School of Winnipeg Inc. ↗
- Who funds The Salvation Army ↗
- Who funds Thrive Community Support Circle ↗
- Who funds Scarboro Foreign Mission Society ↗
- Who funds Christmas Cheer Board ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary · The Winnipeg Foundation · All Charities Campaign · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · St. Joseph's Church · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · The Catholic Foundation of Manitoba · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · Charites Dorais Inc./ Dorais Charities Inc. · The Pollard Family Foundation Inc. · Alan and Doreen Thompson Charitable Foundation Inc. · Les Missionnaires Oblates de Saint-Boniface
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.