Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization

St John Brebeuf Parish

Provide ministries for all people for the purpose of advancing Roman Catholic worship instruction and ministry; perform pastoral work; provide elementary/middle school education and related services; provide and maintain buildings for worship and other religious and community use; organize and provide religious worship and instruction.

C$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$7k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$25k
C$25,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST. JOHN BREBEUF SCHOOL INC.C$25,000
Roman Catholic Archiepiscopal Corporation of WinnipegC$7,203
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$71k · 8 repeat orgsC$36k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

C$71k
C$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+48%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    Roman Catholic Archiepiscopal Corporation of Winnipeg
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$54k · revenue +11%
  • WH
    Winnipeg Harvest
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$3k · revenue +176%
  • AT
    Agape Table
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$3k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • DA
    Development and Peace
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue -54%
  • PM
    Palliative Manitoba
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +7%
  • AD
    Accountable Development Worksgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +441%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jocelyn House Inc.

Operates a palliative care hospice in winnipeg

—
2
Inspired by Wonder Inc.

to provide child care services in the City of Winnipeg

—
3
Winnipeg Housing Rehabilitation Corporation

Providing subsidized rental housing to low-income families; developing neighbourhood strategies for lower income households

—
4
Norwood Nursery School Inc.

The organization operates to provide child care services in the city of winnipeg

—
5
Ronald McDonald House Manitoba Inc.

Rmhc manitoba supports the health and well-being of children by providing a 'home-away-from-home' and other essential servicces for critically ill chronically ill and seriously injured children and their families

—
6
Family Support Centre of Winnipeg Inc.

Operation of a crisis pregnancy centre and activities ancillary thereby for the general benefit of the community.

—
7
Stars of Promise Inc.

To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba.

—
8
Victor Play Centre Inc.

To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba

—
9
Springfield Learning Centres Incorporated

To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba

—
10
St. Vital Child Care Co-Op Inc.

To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba.

—
11
Mlc Montessori Learning Centres Inc.

To provide montessori pre-school program on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba.

—
12
Sugar-N-Spice Kiddie Haven Inc

To provide day care services on a non-profit basis in the province of manitoba.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roman Catholic Archiepiscopal Corporation of Winnipeg and the most unlike its peers is Accountable Development Works. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRoman Catholic Archiepiscopal Corporation of Winnipeg — C$53,889 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetST. JOHN BREBEUF SCHOOL INC. — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetChez Nous — C$5,218 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetDevelopment and Peace — C$5,016 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWinnipeg Harvest — C$3,007 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAgape Table — C$2,725 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPalliative Manitoba — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetROSSBROOK HOUSE INC — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVILLA ROSA INC. — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOur Lady of Victory School Inc. — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAccountable Development Works — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFuture Hope Inc. — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGonzaga Middle School of Winnipeg Inc. — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Salvation Army — C$500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThrive Community Support Circle — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetScarboro Foreign Mission Society — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristmas Cheer Board — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and MaryMB12.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary · The Winnipeg Foundation · All Charities Campaign · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · St. Joseph's Church · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · The Catholic Foundation of Manitoba · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · Charites Dorais Inc./ Dorais Charities Inc. · The Pollard Family Foundation Inc. · Alan and Doreen Thompson Charitable Foundation Inc. · Les Missionnaires Oblates de Saint-Boniface

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 826441032:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on St John Brebeuf Parish’s filings →