Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

St Catharines, ON · Charitable organization

St Catharines Right to Life Association Inc

To promote respect for and protection of human life at all stages from conception to natural death.

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,500
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$340k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MATERCAREC$1,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 37% of grant dollars (C$15k). The 63% that went abroad (C$26k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 63% of all-years giving (C$26k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$37k · 8 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +91% since the first grant, against +87% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

C$37k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+87%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SN
    SOUTH NIAGARA LIFE MINISTRIES
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$6k · revenue +24%
  • TD
    THE DEVEBER INSTITUTE FOR BIOETHICS AND SOCIAL RESEARCH
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$3k · revenue +92%
  • NL
    Niagara Life Centre
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$2k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • EH
    Elisha House
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -83%
  • TR
    Toronto Right To Life Associationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$400 · revenue +87%
  • LC
    LIFE CANADA
    one grant, 2022 · C$250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTH NIAGARA LIFE MINISTRIES — C$5,713 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE DEVEBER INSTITUTE FOR BIOETHICS AND SOCIAL RESEARCH — C$3,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetNiagara Life Centre — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJUSTICE CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS — C$1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHALTON PRO-LIFE O/A HALTON ALIVE — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetElisha House — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetToronto Right To Life Association — C$400 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way of Greater TorontoON4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 119170116:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on St Catharines Right to Life Association’s filings →