Brampton, ON · Charitable organization
St. Bartholomew's United Church
Local ministry of The United Church of Canada including the following programs: weekly worship service (both on-line and in-person) fellowship activities religious sacraments - baptisms weddings funerals spiritual support to the congregation Outreach related activities in the local community both direct and through donations to other…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The United Church of Canada Mission & Service Fund | C$3,163 |
| The Salvation Army | C$2,600 |
| Family Hope Services | C$2,215 |
| Peel Children's Aid Society | C$1,985 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,580 |
| Local Foodbanks | C$1,417 |
| Global Medic | C$600 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$600 |
| Doctors Without Borders | C$600 |
| Canadian Foodgrains Bank | C$500 |
| EVERYMIND | C$500 |
| SHARE Agricultural Foundation | C$500 |
| Regeneration Outreach | C$500 |
| Canadian Red Cross | C$400 |
| Effect Hope | C$250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 88% of grant dollars (C$108k). The 12% that went abroad (C$15k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 12% of all-years giving (C$15k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - MISSION & SERVICE FUND5× · 2019–2024 · C$29k
- FHFamily Hope Services3× · 2021–2024 · C$7k
- SASalvation Army Family Resource Centre6× · 2017–2022 · C$6k
Funded once
- MSMission + Service Fund - United Church of Canadaone grant, 2018 · C$11k
- TUThe United Church of Canada-Mission & Serviceone grant, 2017 · C$10k
- V<Various-all <$1000one grant, 2017 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.