St. Lambert, QC · Charitable organization
St-Barnabas Church
Place of worhsip community space support to congregation outreach to seniors.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$4k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$41k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SYNOD OF THE DIOCESE OF MONTREAL | C$40,837 |
| LOGIFEM INC. | C$1,200 |
| SERVICES COMMUNAUTAIRES OECUMÉNIQUES (SC0)/ECUMENICAL S(...) | C$900 |
| TYNDALE ST. GEORGE'S CHURCH | C$800 |
| WELCOME HALL MISSION | C$500 |
| ALONGSIDE HOPE AUPRÈS DE L'ESPOIR | C$371 |
| MONTREAL DIOCESAN THEOLOGICAL COLLEGE | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$900 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PRIMATE'S WORLD RELEIF AND DEVELOPMENT FUND4× · 2019–2024 · C$7k · revenue +21%
- SOSYNOD OF THE DIOCESE OF MONTREAL2× · 2020–2021 · C$3k · revenue +11%
- LILOGIFEM INC.2× · 2023–2024 · C$2k · revenue +370%
Funded once
- PRPrimate Relief and Development Fundone grant, 2017 · C$3k
- ECECUMENICAL COMMUNITY SERVICESone grant, 2019 · C$3k
- DADESTINY APOSTOLIC MINISTRIESone grant, 2020 · C$3k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aide diverses aux femmes sans abri et en difficulté
Le centre des femmes a pour mission d'offrir des services de première ligne de recherche d'emploi et de formation professionnelle ainsi que des services d'aide et de supports aux femmes québécoises immigrantes et autochtones.
Aide et support aux personnes sans emploi
Aide aux immigrants sde la langue espagnole a s'integrer dans la communaute service d'orientation d'infomation de reference cours de francais aide alimentaire fournir de services religieux toutes les semaines
NOTRE MISSION Maisons de la paix a pour mission d’héberger et d’offrir un soutien à des adolescent(es) à des jeunes adultes et à des femmes avec ou sans enfants exposé(e)s à des situations à risque. Notre accompagnement les amène à…
Eglise catholique
Aide aux immigrants de la langue espagnole a s'integrer dans la communauté service d'orientation d'information de reference cours de francais aide alimentaire fournir de services religieux toutes les semaines
Accueil et intégration des nouveaux arrivants à la société d'accueil; aide aux démunis; comptoir d'aide alimentaire; francisation immigration et traduction; foire santé anuelle; sac-à-dos de la persévérance; aide à la recherche de…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Bon Accueil / Welcome Hall Mission and the most unlike its peers is Logifem inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SYNOD OF THE DIOCESE OF MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds THE PRIMATE'S WORLD RELEIF AND DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds SYNOD OF THE DIOCESE OF MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds DESTINY APOSTOLIC MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LOGIFEM INC. ↗
- Who funds TYNDALE ST. GEORGE'S CHURCH ↗
- Who funds WELCOME HALL MISSION ↗
- Who funds MISSION NOUVELLE GÉNÉRATION ↗
- Who funds SERVICES COMMUNAUTAIRES OECUMÉNIQUES (SC0)/ECUMENICAL S(...) ↗
- Who funds LE CENTRE D'ART DE PRÉVILLE INC. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.