North Hatley, QC · Charitable organization
St Barnabas' Church
Proclamation of the kingdom of anglican church tradition and charitable work – serving the community outreach fellowship.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINTE-ELISABETH | C$3,562 |
| ANGLICAN FOUNDATION OF CANADA | C$500 |
| MENTAL HEALTH ESTRIE | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +835% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DWDR. W. J. KLINCK FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · C$16k · revenue -68%
- QLQUEBEC LODGE FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2021 · C$9k · revenue -14%
- MHMENTAL HEALTH ESTRIE7× · 2017–2023 · C$3k · revenue +835%
Funded once
- PWPRIMATES WORLD RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDone grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue -7%
- COCathedral of the Holy Trinitygraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +29%
- BUBISHOP'S UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · C$200 · revenue -32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Emprunts du fonds à des paroisses à des taux d'intérêts inférieurs à ceux du marché afin d'apporter une aide financière aux fabriques de paroisse
Contribuer a financement des infrastructures et immeubles de l'église catholique de la paroisse la nativité de notre-dame de l'arrondissement beauport de la ville de québec
Préservation et mise en valeur du patrimoine réligieux artistique et architectural de la basilique notre-dame de montréal
Soutien financier à un lieu de culte et patrimonial : fabrique de la paroisse saint-charles-borromée
Support of restauration work of the cathedral building
Aider à la subsistance et aux soins infirmiers des religieuses des soeurs de la présentation de marie du québec.
La paroisse saint-françois d'assise compte plus de 70 bénévoles et 9 employés à temps partagé avec la paroisse st-jean paul ii qui doivent organiser diverses activités de levées de fonds afin de financer les activités de l'enseignement…
Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.
Ramasser des fonds pour restaurer le patrimoine religieux ( église )
Recueillir des fonds pour soutenir les projets et les oeuvres des évêques du québec en vue de promouvoir les valeurs chrétiennes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Anglican Foundation of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Sante Mentale Estrie Inc./ Mental Health Estrie Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DR. W. J. KLINCK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds QUEBEC LODGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRIMATES WORLD RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINTE-ELISABETH ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ESTRIE ↗
- Who funds Anglican Foundation of Canada ↗
- Who funds Cathedral of the Holy Trinity ↗
- Who funds BISHOP'S UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Foundation Office.Ca · R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.