Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization
St Andrews Anglican Church
Advancement of religion through: regular sunday services sunday school classes counseling other routine church activities: baptisms weddings funerals and confirmations community food bank
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$4k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$14k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DIOCESE OF RUPERTSLAND | C$14,335 |
| CANADAHELPS.ORG | C$2,530 |
| PLAN CANADA | C$504 |
| MAIN STREET PROJECT | C$500 |
| AGAPE TABLE | C$371 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$371 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DODiocese of Rupert's Land6× · 2017–2022 · C$92k · revenue +174%
- CCANADAHELPS.ORG5× · 2020–2024 · C$11k · revenue +49%
- PCPLAN CANADA7× · 2018–2024 · C$3k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- ATAGAPE TABLEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$649 · revenue +37%
- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2020 · C$500 · revenue -85%
- WBWEST BROADWAY YOUTH OUTREACH INC.one grant, 2023 · C$386 · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1. Financial Empowerment Champions: We animate support & work with a national network of 14 local non-profit Financial Empowerment Champion (FEC) organizations that are Canada's leaders in providing high quality free financial help to…
To bring together all sectors of our community to work with people who are experiencing homelessness so that together we can prevent homelessness support recovery and wellbeing find suitable housing and measure our success in ways that…
Finca canada's mission is to end poverty through sustainable and scalable solutions that are driven by the insights and needs of people in the communities where they live and work. the charity does this through a range of programs…
Food for the poor-canada is a faith-based organization dedicated to alleviating poverty in latin america and the caribbean. our humanitarian aid provides resources such as food housing and clean water. we also focus on supporting…
Prepares and gives out food packages to homeless people in toronto
The objective of the Foundation is to increase philanthropy through the introduction and management of donor advised funds. Donor advised funds are restricted funds managed by the Foundation that give certain advisory rights to donors. The…
The foundation is committed to reducing poverty in canada. it seeks to accomplish this objective through: (a) a granting program (providing gifts to qualified donees) (b) programming that promotes leadership in poverty reduction and…
Islamic Relief Canada carries out humanitarian and development programs in over 30 countries. Programs include: • Livelihoods focused on climate-adaptive support and/or economic empowerment; • Health including water sanitation and hygiene…
'Provides workshops conferences and demonstration projects on Social Innovation research and similar topics including evaluation and systems change. Supports activities specifically in the social and environmental entrepreneurship sector…
Beneficiaries are pre-qualified amongst the poorest of the poor: 1. provides funding for materials to build low cost houses with approximate area of 200 to 250 square feet for poor families in philippines. 2. provides financial support for…
The Canadian Foodgrains Bank is a partnership of Canadian churches and church-based agencies working to end hunger in developing countries. The charitable programs include provision of food to hungry people funding of programs to improve…
1. Transportation of people adversely affected by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This program consisted of directly purchasing flights ground transportation and hotels for both Ukrainian nationals and those of other nationalities…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Anglican Foundation of Canada and the most unlike its peers is West Broadway Youth Outreach Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · All Charities Campaign · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.