Skip to content

Eston, SK · Charitable organization

St Andrew's United Church Eston Saskatchewan

Worship services weekly services at seniors home pastoral care prayer shawl ministry weekly bible study services available on-line

C$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$150
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$169k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CHURCH MISSION & SERVICE FUNDC$3,610
EGADZ YOUTH CENTREC$302
ESTON '95 LIONSC$150
EATONIA OASIS LIVINGC$150
ST. ANDREW'S COLLEGEC$150
THE MICAH MISSION INC.C$150
SASKATOON FRIENDSHIP INNC$150
THE SALVATION ARMYC$150
CRISIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTREC$150
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$57k · 13 repeat orgsC$150 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

C$57k
C$150

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+2%

Still filing today

85%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church Mission & Service Fund
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$36k · revenue +22%
  • PP
    Prairie Pine Presbytery
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$10k · revenue +96%
  • EY
    EGADZ YOUTH CENTRE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • OL
    Oliver Lodge Care Home
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$150 · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oxford House Saskatchewan Incorporated

Provides housing and support for individuals who have or will have completed a drug treatment program. these individuals are either homeless or at risk of homelessness and express a desire to continue their recovery in a supportive…

—
2
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
3
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
4
Saskatoon Convalescent Home

The organization owns and operates a special care home for the aged. the home provides care for the aged. the home provides care to individuals who require assistance to meet their physical mental social and/or spiritual needs. in doing so…

—
5
Eden Care Suites Inc.

Eden care suites-housing-seniors/low income/disabilities saskatchewan health authority funded independent assessed living (12 suites) private independent assisted living (8 suites)

—
6
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
7
United Church Housing Corporation

United church housing corporation of regina is incorporated under the non profit corporations act of saskatchewan and operates a residential facility for senior citizens who are capable and independent. the facility provides lodging…

—
8
Regina Residential Resource Centre

The centre operates nine programs. the first provides residential respite care for mentally challenged individuals. two programs provide support to mentally challenged adults living independently in the community. four programs each…

—
9
Pine Lodge Addiction Recovery Inc.

Operate a 28-day inpatient treatment cantre for alcholics and drug addicts. clients admitted for treatment are saskatchewan residents and hold a valid saskatchewan health card.

—
10
Ukrainian Orthodox Senior Citizens Society

The organization operates a home for senior citizens in saskatoon. life lease units are assisted living spaces were added on in 2003.

—
11
Lutheran Sunset Home of Saskatoon

To provide to the elderly at affordable costs: a) enriched living accommodations with support services; b) nursing home care with social activities and spiritual care; c) adult day care with activities; intermediate care between housing…

—
12
Saskatoon Mennonite Care Services Inc.

Operated a senior citizens and family facility to provide housing and related physical emotional and spiritual care services.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada/Conseil De Direction De L'armÉE Du Salut Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Eatonia Oasis Living Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church Mission & Service Fund — C$36,035 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPrairie Pine Presbytery — C$10,203 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEGADZ YOUTH CENTRE — C$2,439 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTRE — C$1,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSASKATOON FRIENDSHIP INN — C$1,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICAH MISSION INC. — C$1,050 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST. ANDREW'S COLLEGE — C$1,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$1,050 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetEATONIA OASIS LIVING — C$900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREGINA ANTI-POVERTY MINISTRY (R.A.P.M.) — C$750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER CANADA — C$200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOliver Lodge Care Home — C$150 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Church Mission & Service Fund ↗
  • Who funds Prairie Pine Presbytery ↗
  • Who funds EGADZ YOUTH CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds SASKATOON FRIENDSHIP INN ↗
  • Who funds THE MICAH MISSION INC. ↗
  • Who funds ST. ANDREW'S COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY ↗
  • Who funds EATONIA OASIS LIVING ↗
  • Who funds REGINA ANTI-POVERTY MINISTRY (R.A.P.M.) ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER CANADA ↗
  • Who funds Oliver Lodge Care Home ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Third Avenue United ChurchSK8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Third Avenue United Church · Saskatoon Community Foundation · Community Foundations of Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119165868:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on St Andrew's United Church Eston Saskatchewan’s filings →