Westmeath, ON · Charitable organization
St Andrew's United Church
We hold weekly worship services hold monthly ministries for women; raise funds for other charities financially support the united church of canada mission and services program; support other community organizations with donations and/or use of our facilities for community events for activities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA | C$2,455 |
| THE GRIND PEMBROKE | C$1,070 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TUThe United Church of Canada8× · 2017–2024 · C$21k · revenue +22%
- SJST. JOSEPH'S FOOD BANK3× · 2019–2021 · C$3k · revenue +156%
- TGThe Grind Food Pantry2× · 2022–2024 · C$2k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- TGThe Grind Food Pantryone grant, 2023 · C$1k
- FOFilter of Hopeone grant, 2023 · C$629
- ACADVENTIVE CROSS CULTURAL INITIATIVESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$150 · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Summer and winter camps off-site hiking trips and rv cabin & day rentals
Summer camps with recreational and religious programming geared to age groups : scamper (6 to 8 years) junior (9 to 12 years) teen (13 to 17 years) family camp (allages) and family camps (18+). we also rent our facility to other non-profit…
Own and maintain the united church camp at sherbrooke lake organize and run christian youth camps in july and august. rent camp to groups in the off season.
summer camp program with recreation and religious programming
Summer camps for individuals of all ages in a Christian setting.
Rentals for various religious community and family groups Childrens camps
Church and Camp
Sparrow lake united church camp inc. is a ministry of the toronto united church council that operates sparrow lake camp in port stanton ontario. sparrow lake united church camp is a caring inclusive christian community providing a quality…
Religious camp programs provided
Children's camping program-provide an opportunity for campers at an understanding age to learn about jesus christ the bible leadership and social/physical activities
Children's camps for ages 6-18 in July & August These camps include recreational activities as well as spiritual teaching and development in accordance with evangelical Christianity.
Operation of a residential day /night camp for children ages 6-15 years that promotes emotional physical and spiritual growth and development
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada/Conseil De Direction De L'armÉE Du Salut Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Camp Lau-Ren. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wesley United Church · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.