Skip to content

London, ON · Charitable organization

St Aidan's Church

Weekly worship services.

C$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$13,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUSO COMMUNITY SERVICESC$13,000
SOMERSET RECOVERYC$10,950
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$67k · 5 repeat orgsC$92k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

C$67k
C$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LD
    LONDON DEANERY
    3× · 2020–2022 · C$24k · revenue +2%
  • LC
    LUSO COMMUNITY SERVICES
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$23k · revenue +56%
  • DD
    DEFEAT DUCHENNE CANADA
    3× · 2019–2023 · C$13k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SR
    SOMERSET RECOVERY (300 S EDGEWARE RD ST THOMAS ON( )
    one grant, 2023 · C$14k
  • I
    INDWELLgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$14k · revenue +99%
  • L
    LUSO
    one grant, 2021 · C$11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
London Cares Homeless Response Services

London Cares is a housing First initiative aimed at individuals experiencing chronic and persistent homelessness based on a highly collaborative community-based approach. London Cares provides 24/7 street outreach support engaging with…

—
2
Accessible Housing London

Housing: (low - income accessibility)

—
3
London Housing Registry

Supporting individuals and families experiencing a housing crisis. provide private sector housing referrals to low income individuals and families. offer advocacy and mediation on behalf of landlord and client. offer guest speaking on…

—
4
Leads Employment Services London Inc.

The organization helps people with disabilities and/or barriers to employment find a job that is suitable for them. it also provides training and skills to develop and enhance their skills that would help retain their jobs. in addition the…

—
5
Community Living London

Community living london provides a wide variety of supports to adults and children with developmental disabilities. these include: accomodation for adults; job creation and support for individuals in competitive employment; community…

—
6
Pathways Employment Help Centre

Employment preparation services - job seekers learn to develop resumes prepare for interviews and rediscover the confidence needed to enter or re-enter the workforce. skills training - participants in our skills training programs are…

—
7
Independent Living Centre London and Area

Information referral & networking peer support independent living skill development direct funding of attendant service program.

—
8
L'arche (Stratford)

Group supports - operates several group homes in which developmentally challenged adults live and grow together. supported independent living - provides apartments in which developmentally challenged adults can be helped to live…

—
9
L'arche Toronto Homes Inc.

L'arche toronto homes inc. provides homes and programs where people with developmental disabilities and those who assist them live and work together

—
10
Innovative Community Support Services

The organization operates residences for physically and developmentally delayed adults. the organization offers employment programs social enterprise community programming and semi-independent living for individuals.

—
11
St. Leonard's Society of London

Residential and non-residential programs designed to promote responsible community living. Programs include Community Service Order - Youth & Adult 4 community residential homes and numerous support programs.

—
12
London Community Foundation

London community foundation strengthens its community by making grants to qualified donees in london and middlesex counties in the areas of arts and culture recreation education environment health & community services. additionally london…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is L'arche London and the most unlike its peers is The Jesse Davidson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLONDON DEANERY — C$23,812 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetLUSO COMMUNITY SERVICES — C$23,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetINDWELL — C$13,580 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEFEAT DUCHENNE CANADA — C$12,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLUSO — C$11,165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOMERSET RECOVERY — C$10,950 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPRIMATE'S WORLD RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT FUND (PWRDF) — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetL'ARCHE — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARK ALD — C$3,039 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHN AMBULANCE — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LONDON DEANERY ↗
  • Who funds LUSO COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds INDWELL ↗
  • Who funds DEFEAT DUCHENNE CANADA ↗
  • Who funds LUSO ↗
  • Who funds SOMERSET RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds PRIMATE'S WORLD RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT FUND (PWRDF) ↗
  • Who funds L'ARCHE ↗
  • Who funds ARK ALD ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN AMBULANCE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadahelps CanadonON2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 131965238:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on St Aidan's Church’s filings →