Surrey, BC · Charitable organization
South Fraser Unitarian Congregation
We provided 2 church services/mouth until july; one service/mouth sept-dec.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SURREY FOOD BANK SOCIETY | C$970 |
| SOURCES WHITE ROCK SOUTH SURREY FOOD BANK | C$970 |
| SOURCES LANGLEY FOOD BANK | C$970 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +130% since the first grant, against +66% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SCSOURCES COMMUNITY SERVICES SOCIETY6× · 2018–2023 · C$11k
- SFSURREY FOOD BANK SOCIETY8× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +130%
- CUCANADIAN UNITARIAN COUNCIL3× · 2018–2020 · C$1k
Funded once
- RCRED CROSS (CANADIAN) - FLOOD RELIEFone grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue -22%
- SCSources Community Services Societygraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +66%
- CUCanadian Unitarian Councilgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$351 · revenue +240%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.