Shelburne, NS · Charitable organization
Solid Rock Equipping Ministries Inc.
Solid rock ceased weekly activities for the present in january of 2023 - we did have limited activities in 2023
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHELBURNE BAPTIST CHURCH | C$1,025 |
| CAMP JORDAN | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$200 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SBSHELBURNE BAPTIST CHURCH3× · 2018–2021 · C$1k · revenue +52%
- SHSOULS HARBOUR RESCUE3× · 2020–2022 · C$1k · revenue +202%
- GIGIDEONS INT.3× · 2019–2021 · C$538 · revenue +14%
Funded once
- CJCAMP JORDANone grant, 2018 · C$535
- BPBILL PRANKARD EVANGELISTIC ASSNone grant, 2021 · C$300 · revenue -14%
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSIONone grant, 2021 · C$300
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missions/evangelism
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Advancing the Kingdom of God through Soul Winning evangelism outreaches and Church planting. Worship & bible study. Provides aid to Peace House International Satellite Churches in 5 countries. Provide aid to low-income persons. Counselling…
Share the Gospel within and outside of Canada through church events and outreach.
Conducts missionary work in the developing countries
Church services programs television ministry (living truth) and global missions
Church services missionary work
Global missions incorporated is an organization whose mission is the promotion of the gospel and the relief of poverty.
Programs directed at supporting the christian church as follows: 1) printing and distributing bibles and other religious materials to churches 2) providing basic necessities for christian churches and ministries such as food and clothing…
The organization operates global Christian mission programs by training and sending missionaries and church planting teams to all parts of the world. MULTIPLY Network builds the capacity of national leaders to contribute in the same ways.…
1. teaching and preaching 2. church planting 3. outreach 4. discipleship
Conducting religious services sending relief to impoverished people in developing countries supporting missionary activities around the world and conducting short term mission trips
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ShareWord Global Canada and the most unlike its peers is Shelburne Baptist Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.