Edmonton, AB · Charitable organization
Solbrekken Evangelistic Association of Canada
The primary purpose of the charity is to spread the gospel build churches and assist people in underpriviledged countries as well as canada.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PENTACOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANDADA | C$3,000 |
| KILLAM PENTECOSTAL TABERNACLE | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PAPENTACOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA6× · 2019–2024 · C$32k · revenue +14%
- HMHOPE MISSION4× · 2017–2022 · C$3k · revenue +185%
- BTBETHEL TABERNACLE OF PRESTON2× · 2019–2021 · C$3k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- KPKILLAM PENTECOSTAL TABERNACLEone grant, 2022 · C$141k
- ELEMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCHone grant, 2019 · C$5k · revenue -98% · 39% of their budget
- EFEDMONTON'S FOOD BANKone grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide academic training for the ministry of the gospel
To advance the christian faith and assist and support the local church across canada in their task of fulfilling the great commission of jesus christ through composing recording publishing and performing innovative and theologically sound…
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
Preaching on churches within canada
Preaching the gospel prayer meetings worship services training and overseeing other pastors and churches planting churches ordaining pastors missions work within Canada and the world.
Operated a church and supported missionaries both in canada and in foreign countries
Publishing missionary organizations evangelism social outreach religious fellowship
place of worship christian counselling evangelism missions and equipping of pastors
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
All religious activities of a functioning church congregation including public worship christian education councelling services and world evangelism.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Great Commission Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Norquay Emmanuel Lutheran Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PENTACOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds EMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds HOPE MISSION ↗
- Who funds BETHEL TABERNACLE OF PRESTON ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIANS OF EVANGELICAL FAITH OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds EDMONTON'S FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE MUSTARD SEED ↗
- Who funds KILLAM PENTECOSTAL TABERNACLE ↗
- Who funds TRUE NORTH ↗
- Who funds THE GREAT COMMISSION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.