Skip to content

Digby, NS · Charitable organization

Society of Our Lady Saint Mary

Provide a place of prayer and hospitality

C$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$660
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$570
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$915k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORPUS CHRISTI PARISHC$660
PARISH OF CLEMENTSC$570
SMITH'S COVE BAPTIST CHURCHC$85
TRI-COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTRE SOCIETYC$20
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$139k · 9 repeat orgsC$150 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

C$139k
C$150

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    TRI-COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTRE SOCIETY
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$130k · revenue +9%
  • PO
    PARISH OF CLEMENTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +36%
  • CC
    CORPUS CHRISTI PARISH
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +896%

Funded once

  • WM
    WALTON MEMORIAL UNITED CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · C$100 · revenue -16%
  • PO
    PARISH OF ST MARY'S CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · C$50 · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Holy Trinity Anglican Church

Church services

—
2
Pleasant Point Union Church

Church services during july & august

—
3
Trinity United Church

Weekly worship services communion weddings funerals

—
4
St Mary's Anglican Church

Provide sacraments of anglican communion and religious services on the 1st 3rd and 5th sunday's of each month.

—
5
Trinity Presbyterian Church

Worship services

—
6
Trinity United Church

Worship Services, Bible Study Groups and Discussion Groups, Pastoral Care

—
7
Bear Point United Baptist Church

Church services

—
8
Holy Trinity Church (Anglican)

Worship services church meetings pastoral services/care

—
9
St Thomas Anglican Church

Church services

—
10
St. Mary's Anglican Church

Weekly services (in person and online) funeral and wedding services visiting parishioners.

—
11
Trinity Anglican Church

Regular worship services - weekly special and seasonal

—
12
St. Mary's Anglican Church

Sunday services weddings bible study funerals baptisms confirmations sunday school

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walton Memorial United Church and the most unlike its peers is Tricounty Pregnancy Care Centre Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRI-COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTRE SOCIETY — C$130,040 over 3y, 13% of budgetPARISH OF CLEMENTS — C$4,490 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI PARISH — C$2,925 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSMITH'S COVE BAPTIST CHURCH — C$505 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOUTREACH MINISTRY — C$225 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH OF THE NATIVITY — C$175 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetANGLICAN CHURCH WOMEN DIOCESE OF HURON — C$125 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWALTON MEMORIAL UNITED CHURCH — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAYLESFORD UNITED BAPTIST CHURCH — C$85 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARISH OF ST MARY'S CHURCH — C$50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRICOUNTY PREGNANCY CARE CENTRE ASSOCIATION — C$40 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

My Tribute Gift FoundationON3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 119155000:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Society of Our Lady Saint Mary’s filings →