Longueuil, QC · Charitable organization
Société de Sclérose Systémique (Sclerodermie) du Québec Inc.
Une mission à plusieurs volets l'objectif ultime:vaincre la maladie travaillant sur plusieurs fronts l'organisme s'est donné pour missio; d'aider les personnes atteintes de sclérodermine en leur offrant du soutien moral ou médical; d'amasser des fonds pour la recherche en sclérodermie; développer des outils d information pour la…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$40k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$141k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTRE DE RECHERCE CHUM JL SÉNÉCAL | C$141,250 |
| GROUPE DE RECERCHE CANADIEN SUR LA SCLÉRODERMIE | C$25,000 |
| UNIVERSITÉ MCGILL SPIN-SHARE DR BRETT THOMBS | C$15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 87% of grant dollars (C$1.5M). The 13% that went abroad (C$224k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 13% of all-years giving (C$224k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$40k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CDCENTRE DE RECHERCHE CHUM7× · 2018–2024 · C$1.4M · revenue +39%
- FQFONDATION QUÉBÉCOISE DES VÉTÉRANS2× · 2022–2023 · C$65k
- UMUNIVERSITÉ MCGILL - PROJET SPIN-SHARE DR BRETT THOMBS2× · 2022–2023 · C$25k
Funded once
- GDGROUPE DE RECHERCHE CANADIEN SUR LA SCLÉRODERMIEone grant, 2023 · C$94k
- CSCANADIAN SCLERODERMA RESEARCH GROUP DR MARIE HUDSONone grant, 2021 · C$45k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.