Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Societe de Developpement Communautaire de Montreal (Sodecm)

élaborer et proposer des pratiques urbaines contribuant à créer des villes écologiques démocratiques et en santé.

C$103k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$27k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$11k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$91k
C$11,800
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRE SAGUENAYC$26,600
CRE MONTÉRÉGIEC$24,525
ECO DE LA POINTE AUX PRAIRIESC$16,800
GRAMEC$11,800
PARK PEOPLEC$11,550
CRE CHAUDIERES APPALACHESC$8,800
CRE MONTREALC$1,250
LES AMIS DE LA MONTAGNEC$1,250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.1M · 14 repeat orgsC$223k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

C$1.1M
C$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-4%

Still filing today

93%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CLEAN AIR PARTNERSHIP
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$397k · revenue +51%
  • SC
    SUSTAINABLE CALGARY SOCIETY
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$259k · revenue +206% · 80% of their budget
  • PP
    PARK PEOPLE
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$130k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUSTAINABLE CALGARY SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · C$112k
  • PP
    PARK PEOPLE
    one grant, 2023 · C$34k
  • CC
    CRE CHAUDIÈRES APPALACHES
    one grant, 2023 · C$25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trajectoire Québec

Activités bénéfices projets relatif à la mobilité urbaine projets relatif à l'environnement

—
2
Societe De Developpement Communautaire De Montreal (Sodecm)

Élaborer et proposer des pratiques urbaines contribuant à créer des villes écologiques démocratiques et en santé. l'expertise en matière d'aménagement durable des milieux de vie couvre trois champs : aménager l'environnement urbain pour…

—
3
L'Institut international de Montréal pour l'environnement / the Montreal international institute for the environment
—
4
Sollicité

L'organisme a pour mission de mettre en place des projets environnementaux visant la protection de l'environnement et l'amélioration de la qualité de vie des montréalais.

—
5
ÉQuiterre

Mobilité et transport : nous faisons la promotion du transport actif collectif et partagé pour permettre à tout le monde d'effectuer ses déplacements sans recourir uniquement à la voiture solo. nous initions des projets et des campagnes…

—
6
Info-Nature Mauricie

Sensibiliser la population à l'importance de la protection de l'environnement et des ressources

—
7
Connexion Justice Sociale / Social Justice Connection

Agent.e de changement : action climatique Agent.e de Changement vise à aiguiser tes capacités d’analyse et d’actions afin que tu puisses assumer pleinement ton rôle d’écocitoyen.ne du XXIe siècle. De l'étude des comportements…

—
8
Mouvement Ecologique Du Haut Richelieu

Interventions concernant la gestion durable de la plaine inondable de la rivière richelieu et de ses affluents; proposition d'aire protégée pour les habitats aquatiques et riverains de la rivière richelieu; interventions pour la protection…

—
9
Conseil RÉGional De L'environnement De Laval

Assurer le regroupement la coordination et la concertation des corporations des organismes et des individus de laval intéressés à la protection et la mise en valeur de l'environnement; - être le porte-parole de la pensée régionale en ce…

—
10
Association Québécoise De Lutte Contre La Pollution atmosphérique (Aqlpa)

In former & pensibelicer la population un général aux méfaits de la pollution atmospherique

—
11
Nature Québec

1. la commission agriculture intervient pour rendre compatible la pratique de l'agriculture avec le maintien des écosystèmes dans les régions agricoles et les communautés qui en dépendent. 2. la commission aires protégées travaille à la…

—
12
Piétons Québec

1) romouvoir l'education concernant la sécurité routière et l'usage de la marche comme mode de transport en organisant des campagnes de sensibilisation des colloques des formations et des communiqués de presse pour le bénéfice du public…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conseil régional de l'environnement de Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Afrique au féminin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLEAN AIR PARTNERSHIP — C$397,151 over 4y, 17% of budgetSUSTAINABLE CALGARY SOCIETY — C$258,999 over 3y, 80% of budgetPARK PEOPLE — C$130,435 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCRE MONTÉRÉGIE — C$60,273 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetCRE SAGUENAY — C$45,600 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCRE MONTÉRÉGIE — C$33,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCONSEIL RÉGIONAL DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT DE MONTRÉAL — C$26,599 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetECO DE LA POINTE AUX PRAIRIES — C$24,800 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCONSEIL RÉGIONAL DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT CHAUDIÈRES-APPALACHES — C$23,800 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGRAME — C$22,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGREEN COMMUNUNITIES CANADA — C$5,361 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetCARREFOUR JEUNESSE EMPLOI SHAWINIGAN — C$5,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN UP — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMITE DES CITOYENS DU QUARTIER SAINT-SAUVEUR — C$3,068 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAFRIQUE AU FÉMININ — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRE LASALLIEN DE SAINT MICHEL — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTABLE QUARTIER LÈENGRENAGE DE SAINT-ROCH — C$2,128 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Td Friends of the Env…The Trottier Family F…La Fondation Rossy th…Fondation Écho /Echo …La Fondation du Grand…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Td Friends of the Environment FoundationON9.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Td Friends of the Environment Foundation · The Trottier Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Trottier · La Fondation Rossy the Rossy Foundation · Fondation Écho /Echo Foundation · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-09-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 894916071:2024-09-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Societe de Developpement Communautaire de Montreal (Sodecm)’s filings →