Skip to content

Brossard, QC · Charitable organization

Société de biologie de Montréal inc.

Tenir des excursions en sciences naturelles: ornithologie botanique (fleurs sauvages champignons) entomologie.

C$500
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$200
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$100
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$35k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIGRATION RESEARCH FUNDATIONC$200
UNION QUÉBÉCOISE DES OISEAUX DE PROIEC$100
CENTRE DE RÉHABILITATION LE NICHOIRC$100
COMITÉ RÉGIONAL POUR LA PROTECTION DES FALAISESC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2k · 6 repeat orgsC$559 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

C$2k
C$359

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-77%
+187%

Still filing today

17%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UQ
    Union québécoise de réhabilitation des oiseaux de proie
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$875
  • CD
    CENTRE DE REHABILITATION LE NICHOIR INC.
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$575
  • RD
    REGROUPEMENT DES ÉTUDIANTS ET ÉTUDIANTES EN BIOLOGIE DE L'UQ
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$400

Funded once

  • FD
    FONDATION DE LA FAUNE DU QUÉBEC
    one grant, 2018 · C$135
  • FD
    Fondation de la faune du Québecgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$124 · revenue +187%
  • FC
    FÉDÉRATION CANADIENNE DE LA FAUNE
    one grant, 2023 · C$100 · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMITÉ RÉGIONAL POUR LA PROTECTION DES FALAISES — C$250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIGRATION RESEARCH FUNDATION — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFondation de la faune du Québec — C$124 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFÉDÉRATION CANADIENNE DE LA FAUNE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMITÉ RÉGIONAL POUR LA PROTECTION DES FALAISES ↗
  • Who funds MIGRATION RESEARCH FUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Fondation de la faune du Québec ↗
  • Who funds FÉDÉRATION CANADIENNE DE LA FAUNE ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 107987877:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Société de biologie de Montréal’s filings →