Fabreville-Laval, QC · Charitable organization
Société Bouddhique Laotienne
Promouvoir de l'enseignement et la pratique de la religion bouddhique - réaliser les actes de bienfaisance et charité.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA FONDATION CANADIENNE DES POMPIERS MORTS EN SERVICE | C$803 |
| REVUE LE PARTENAIRE FRAT. POLICIER DE LAVAL | C$592 |
| FONDATION DES ÉTOILES | C$365 |
| CENTRAIDE DU GRAND MONTRÉAL | C$310 |
| CROIX-ROUGE CANADIENNE | C$250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FDFONDATION DE LA RECHERCHE PEDIATRIQUE4× · 2018–2023 · C$1k · revenue -8%
- CDCENTRAIDE DE GRAND MONTRÉAL3× · 2018–2021 · C$800
- CRCROIX ROUGE CANADIENNE3× · 2018–2021 · C$800
Funded once
- FDFONDATION DES CANADIENNE DES POMPIERS MONT EN SERVICEone grant, 2023 · C$803
- CBCENTRE BÉNÉVOLAT DE LAVALone grant, 2019 · C$250
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.