Skip to content

East St Paul, MB · Public foundation

Slawa Foundation

To solicit and receive gifts bequests trusts funds and property and beneficially or as a trustee or agent to hold invest develop manage accumulate and administer funds and property for the purpose of distributing funds and property exclusively to registered charities and 'qualified donees' under the provisions of the income…

C$26k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
1
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$7,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$702k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILDLIFE RESCUE NETWORK INC.C$7,500
PRAIRIE WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE INC.C$7,500
FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH OF ST. VITALC$6,000
SILOAM MISSIONC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$54k · 5 repeat orgsC$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

C$54k
C$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PRAIRIE WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE INC.
    4× · 2018–2022 · C$16k · revenue +88%
  • SM
    SILOAM MISSION
    5× · 2018–2022 · C$14k · revenue +56%
  • MB
    MENNONITE BRETHREN COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE INC.
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$6k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • EE
    ELLERINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · C$11k · revenue 0%
  • AS
    ARTHRITIS SOCIETY OF MANITOBA
    one grant, 2019 · C$4k · revenue +6%
  • PW
    PRAIRIE WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE INC.
    one grant, 2021 · C$3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alberta Institute for Wildlife Conservation

Alberta institute for wildlife conservation is committed to the rescue rehabilitation and release of injured and orphaned wildlife. we provide expert advice and education that fosters an appreciation of wildlife. our current programs are -…

—
2
Wild for Life

To rescue rehabilitate & reintegrate injured & orphaned wildlife into their natural habitateas well as to advance the public's awareness and understanding about the proper response to wildlife found sick injuredand/or orphanedin the wild…

—
3
Living Sky Wildlife Rehabilitation Inc.

We take in injured & orphaned wildlife with the goal of returning them to the wild. we provide all necessary care from nutrition medical and housing to ensure survival upon release. we offer information and education to the public at…

—
4
Woodlands Wildlife Sanctuary

Rescue Rehabilitation and Release of orphaned sick and injured wildlife. Conduct educational programs for schools interest groups and other organizations

—
5
Erie Wildlife Rescue

Ewr is dedicated to the treatment care and subsequent release of injured wild life back into the wild. ewr strives to educate the public promote the value of wildlife and the environment and encourage positive interactions between people…

—
6
Elizabeth's Wildlife Center Society

Rehabilitate sick orphan and injured wild birds and small mammals & release them bakc into the wild education to public concerning wildlife & their habitat. answering the many questions the community has regarding wildlife.

—
7
Manitoba Bear Rehabilitation Centre Inc.

Providing care for orphaned bear cubs until they are large enough to be released back into the wild. educating the public about how to peacfully coexist with the bears and other wild animals.

—
8
Wra Wildlife Rescue Association of B C

Rescue treatment and rehabilitation of injured orphaned or pollution-damaged wildlife; public education including school and community groups; advice and guidance to the public on wildlife issues in person and through the wildlife helpline.

—
9
Salthaven Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Centre Inc.

Salthaven wildlife rehabilitation & education centre inc is committed to the care and rehabilitation of sick injured orphaned or otherwise compromised wildlife and returning healthy animals to their natural habitat. through education we…

—
10
Wildlife Rehabilitation Society of Edmonton

We provide passionate care for injured and orphand wildlife. w annually treat over 1 400 wildlife patients field over 5 000 wildlife related calls from the community and provide education on human/wildlife interaction to more than 6 000…

—
11
Wildlife Haven Rehabilitation Centre Inc.

Rehabilitation of injured sick or orphaned wildlife to enable their return to the wild. education about awareness appreciation and peaceful coexistence with wildlife.

—
12
Silverwood Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre Inc.

Wildlife rehabilitation

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prairie Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Ellerington Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRAIRIE WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE INC. — C$15,725 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetSILOAM MISSION — C$14,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE RESCUE NETWORK INC. — C$11,225 over 4y, 14% of budgetELLERINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — C$11,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMENNONITE BRETHREN COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE INC. — C$6,422 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWINNIPEG YOUTH ORCHESTRAS INC. — C$6,400 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetFAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH OF ST. VITAL — C$6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetARTHRITIS SOCIETY OF MANITOBA — C$3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg FoundationMB7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-02-28, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 848535431:2022-02-28 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Slawa’s filings →